look in at pics of it i dont thinks it right at all!!!!!
2006-09-08 06:35:28 · 15 answers · asked by thisisallinyourhead 1 in Pets ➔ Dogs
Alex G - the question was about animal cruelty, not killing and yes, of course, causing pain and suffering to any living creature is wrong.
One of the three predictors of a serial killer is animal cruelty (along with arson and bed wetting). People who get pleasure from torturing animals are sick.
And, by-the-way, animals have feelings and emotions just like people and so it follows that they have souls.
2006-09-08 07:40:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
God gave man domain over the animals.Which unfortuneately means that we decide what's in their best interest as well as how we treat and keep them.
God also gave instructions on how man was to kill the animals so humans could eat them.Their throats were to be cut because it's quick and painless.The animal gets very tired as the blood runs out and it drops off to sleep.It's HIS way and really the most humane.The animal feels nothing but something slide across it's neck.Unless of course the knife is dull.
And I do not believe for one second that God sits in heaven watching his creatures be tortured and abused and neglected by man without a care.
In the end God will decide these horrible peoples punishment and it will be much harsher than any man could impose.Small comfort at times but please believe that.
2006-09-08 15:01:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. It doesn't even begin to approach the norms of common sense and human morality in general.
Personally, I believe that anyone who performs cruel acts to animals should have the same thing done to them as punishment.
Would that kind of cruelty to a person be right? Well no but I tend to believe in an eye for an eye when it comes to animals.
2006-09-08 06:47:05 · answer #3 · answered by Dick 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cruelty how? Like animal testing or like beatin the **** outta your canines or some ****? yet once you propose testing then you certainly ought to relize that yeah its horribly unhappy yet with out them testing on them we wouldnt have 0.5 the medicine or something that we've. even although there no longer comparable to us on the interior or outdoors its nevertheless safer then doin it on a individual ya be attentive to? And as for beating animals and ravenous them and **** its ****** incorrect whatever way you check out it
2016-10-14 11:19:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not, its awful. It takes a sick person to hurt a defenseless and innocent animal. The abusers should have the same thing done to them.
2006-09-08 06:48:39 · answer #5 · answered by TritanBear 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell no! That's why it is illegal, not to mention immoral. Anybody who abuses an animal should be punished to the full extent of the law.
2006-09-08 06:39:54 · answer #6 · answered by msnite1969 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
anyone who is cruel to an animal should never be allowed to have children... No it's not right!!!!
2006-09-08 06:45:30 · answer #7 · answered by Not Me 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What some call "cruelty" others call "discipline". Those who call it discipline are a bit sick. So no, it's not right.
2006-09-08 06:48:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, umm... that's why is called cruelty and why there are laws against it in most states
2006-09-08 06:39:17 · answer #9 · answered by searchpup 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't "cwy" honey...you'll GROW UP & get a brain eventually.
2006-09-08 07:14:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋