Which is correct?

Question

One: He doesn't have the hands.
Two: He doesn't have hands.

Answer 1

He doesn't have hands. Unless you're referring to someone who is literally holding a pair of hands, like ones made of clay or stone, for example. Or if you're talking about hands of cards.

If you're talking about a person not having literal hands, it's the second.

Answer 2

2

Answer 3

Both could be correct, depending on the context.

He doesn't have hands means that he doesn't now have hands (they were cut off, for example he was a twice-caught thief in Saudi Arabia so they cut off both hands).

He doesn't have the hands would be correct in response to the question, Do you think he's make a good basketball player? No, he doesn't have the hands, meaning he's not good with his hands.

Answer 4

Both are correct depending on the meaning you want to give.
The 1st says that he doesn't have the hands as thou he should be in possession of a lot of them like the hands of the crash test dummies, for instance.
The 2nd one says that he's disabled, and that he has no hands of his own.

Answer 5

The second one is correct.

Answer 6

Both are correct but mean different things.
One: If he doesn't have the hands, he is a butterfingers.
Two: If he doesn't hand he's paraplegic.
Peace.

Answer 7

The second, unless you're referring to some specific hands (let's say, he was going to the mannequin supply store or something, and forgot part of the order).

Answer 8

The second one
"He doesn't have hands."

Answer 9

the second one is correct--the first one really does not make sense

Answer 10

I'm correct haha