2006-09-08 03:21:42 · 14 answers · asked by Your Downfall 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes. I would say between the age group of 21-35. We should also be allowed to wash and scrub them if we feel like it.
2006-09-08 03:22:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why stop at 35 yrs age why not 17 yrs upwards to 99 yrs of age for both sex..lol
2006-09-08 10:27:24 · answer #2 · answered by JJ 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What's the point? Is it so you can lust in your imagination? Well if you are lusting in your imagination why not imagine the image of your favorite movie star of something? It doesn't make sense to go to a candy store withour money and it really doesn't make sense to lust after something that you can't have. In the case of most lustful people, when they really get to the real thing they are so crazy in their imagination from dreaming about it that they are over it before they start. It is better to not think about it until you are actually engaged in the real thing with a real wife. It then will bless both of you.
2006-09-08 10:30:07 · answer #3 · answered by happylife22842 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Only if it is mandatory to be made to pee in public (men only that is so the women can see the shortcomings).
2006-09-08 10:25:57 · answer #4 · answered by Frank 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, depends on the community, I would not personally want to see SOME ladies waddle to the trough
2006-09-08 10:28:33 · answer #5 · answered by Mike R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why? so you can get your quota of boobage daily? how about this instead? all men between 18 and 35 should not be allowed sex for asking sexist questions?
2006-09-08 10:24:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Okay but then we get to lock any man we want in a great dungeon. Deal?
2006-09-08 10:25:21 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah - but what what about the fat ones? I mean come - there are some things that are just to unholy to look at.
2006-09-08 10:25:31 · answer #8 · answered by rab2344 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you are a godly pervert
sick minded freak
2006-09-08 10:23:30 · answer #9 · answered by lizzy loves life. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.. it would be great but morally, a disaster
2006-09-08 10:23:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋