all Religions are a load of bull dust?

Question

islam, christianity, hindu, buddhism, judaism, sikhism and every religion is nothing but bunk, and i can prove it

do you agree with me that religions are bunk?

Answer 1

No! Rather all impure religions (law law) are as "dung"(should be flushed). But "pure reigion" (grace) and truth thereof notably arrived "undefiled" and also remained "unspotted" in it's come and go "visit"-ation to those "afflicted" with a bad case of life + death = a dead end (Holy Bible: New Testament: James 1:27).

http://www.godshew.org/RevelatorySermons7.htm

The Jews religion is Horeb-bull (law law). Islam is Horeb-bull (law law). Modern Christianity is Horeb-bull (law law). Such "high" and mighty bull seems to stem from Mt Horeb(Sinai) in Arabia,

http://www.godshew.org/MtSinai.htm

where Moses' law was a "great terror"-ist to all "Israel"(of Jacob/Israel). Selah.

Pst - the "higher" exhortation is: "mind not high things": Rom 12:16 and be not "highminded": Rom 11:20; 1Tim 6:17; Since "highminded", like "doubleminded" law law, is among "unholy" things: 2Tim 3. So "from such turn away", from such like as a God on "high" in the plural and divided law law "heavens", and his right hand man. For even when right "standing" of such left/right law/law of them vs them (who "oppose themselves" with law), it's still "law", still "law worketh wrath"(Rom 4:15), which God hath NOT appointed us unto: 1Thess 5:9. Selah.

Law Law? The 2nd is like the 1st: Law(sin, death, hell).
http://www.godshew.org/TwainShew4.htm#Laws

Not to mention "false Christs shall arise" obviously make for "false" Christians, who did not "take heed" of "many shall come" to "deceive", and "shall deceive many", if they don't "give more earnest heed" to what's been said, especially if "escape" (of "no escape" or "escape") is via "give more earnest heed", and especially to what's "God said", such as "let there be light" (not lights, nor light + darkness), and as if declaring the end from the beginning, since the beginning of wisdom and knowledge is "fear"(hath torment) and "this gospel" (of this/that gospels) is notably the "beginning" of ww "sorrows" in Mt 24. So perhaps "that gospel" of "that God" and of "that Christ" of "that Jesus Christ" is come(already), came with "grace & truth", of the Lord is now "that Spirit(God)", shall also be told ww, for compare-i-son of this/that, beginning/end; the exhortation being he that endureth unto the end shall be saved(only) by grace(only), not both saved + destroyed after by grace + law(addead) as those saved out of Egypt went a wandering to Mt Sinai in Arabia, and it obviously made them 'law law' rather than grace us. And it took them law law folk 40 yrs to make a trip a child on crutches could make in a week. Selah.

The "grace" of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Answer 2

Religions are man made. They are the collective idea of people have the same ideas. But remember they are man made! Anything that is man made will have flaws. To be religious however is a personal relationship with your higher power or belief system. It is unique to you with those boundaries and actions that you are led to hold true. No person can say that their religion is correct however each one of them does. Let your heart, your inner energy speak to you and believe that. Don't trust what you can't count on.

Answer 3

True, I agree. Their basic premise is false. There are no gods. They like to pretend that they dictate morality, but societies still evolve and the morality of the people with it.

There is some wisdom presented in religions, but only because the people writing the books look at what works and doesn't work in society. We should glean what useful information there is from them. However, there is also a lot of nonsense that they try to pass off as wisdom.

Answer 4

I am sorry you feel that way. No religions are not bunk. They help people live on more levels than you can understand.

Answer 5

No, my religion is more of a philosophy anyway. The only supernatural thing we believe in is reincarnation. The rest is psychology.

Answer 6

faith serves a sort of social applications, and each society in the worldwide has a sequence of ideals that must be categorised as faith. between those applications is the creation of a community based around a hardship-loose thought shape and the skill to describe issues in the worldwide around us, as properly to offering ethical codes that maximum any deist or humanist might discover benefit in. Atheism as a non secular place is, fairly conversing, an exceedingly new theory in the West, and that i frankly discover it to be an conceited place, because it labels each individual who participates in non secular prepare or holds non secular considered an psychological inferior. it is like the fifteen-twelve months-old who comprises a author's team for adults and reads off a trite and uninteresting tale approximately how anybody in the worldwide yet him is stupid, then expects to be hailed because of the fact the terrific author because of the fact that James Joyce by making use of the older and greater matured writers who've been.observing and writing bearing directly to the worldwide around them because of the fact that in the previous the youngster became into born. technology has no longer "proved all religions to be a load of rubbish," for many motives that i ought to argue, however the single i'll carry on with is that technology is desirous bearing directly to the reason of organic regulation. faith isn't ruled by making use of organic regulation, and subsequently even obvious obvious contradictions would be rejected by making use of believers, no longer because of the fact they are stupid, yet because of the fact they do no longer take undertaking with those obvious flaws, and that they rather do no longer see them as absolute deal-breakers as atheists do. possibly organic selection applies right here. faith has existed for an exceedingly long term, and it maintains to exist, so it ought to no longer be as vulnerable and ineffective as you grow to hearken to to it to be. (part notice: I dislike Bible-thumpers on my doorstep, too, yet rejecting each non secular gadget in the whole worldwide because of the fact one team of religious human beings gets on your nerves is notably unreasonable. study some Buddhist or Taoist philosophy in the previous you're making an exceedingly final call on how thoroughly with out fee faith is.)

Answer 7

not unless you can prove it. i seriously doubt you can to everyone's satisfaction. when you can create the glories of nature and be able to create the dead to live again along with numberless other little miracles then i would say you are on your way to proving until then I will still Belieeve in THE CREATOR or THE DEITY whichever NAME you prefer.

Answer 8

I dont agree....if it's bunk then y do so mani ppl still believe in it ?

Answer 9

I don't agree with you but I'm not worried. When the time comes, your knee will bend and you will confess that Christ is Lord.

Answer 10

I happen to agree but I am rather intrigued to see what "proof" you put forward.