English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since Creation is the explanation for everything we see, AND the best explanation.

2006-09-07 20:11:53 · 18 answers · asked by curious_inquisitor 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Brenda - You know all that is based on the junk you believe about God. That he is unjust, mean, not going to judge rightly, ect... Did it ever occur to you that things you don't like, require trusting God? And being understanding? You don't know the whole truth about all those issues, in spite of your very negative perspective, God IS on top of every issue you have with the Bible. If you could only trust him. All those topics will reflect the fact that God is holy and just. That he is love.

2006-09-07 20:34:56 · update #1

18 answers

btw the bible, or creation, is a translated work of a translated work of a translated storry. lets see how that works, you tell some one a phrase, and have them tell some one and that person tell some one and that last person tell you. lets see if a 15 word phrase is accurate at the end. now, lets go with just the old text, that the jewish faith belvies in where creation comes from. try geting that message across with out loseing its meaning. dont put stock in the works of men, put stock in prayer and the guidence it gives you. thats the real message of the menaing behind the bible not whats been translated.

and to those who think im dissing the bible and are big evolution fools, read the rest.

if you assume that the big bang happened, then what put the materal there in the first place? i look at the universe and its make up in the same way i look at a kindergarden class. tell a kid to build a car or plane. whats the child going to go for, legos. building blocks, what ever you want to call them its an efficent way of makeing things, to use small uniformed yet diffrent shape and sized pices that can go together in diffrent ways. just like oh atoms. just like evolution. theres two ways to look at it, the normal darwin way of just beliveing what ever is writen, or looking at the facts, man comeing from an ape. doubt it. 1 if evilution exist lets look at something we arnt related to to see how it works. a whale... now evolutionist say this creature used to walk on land and looked some what like an anchent cow. wow. ok it gets the idea to go swimming and enjoys it and one day it becomes a whale. and we know this because why? it has feet, on the inside of the body many whales have bones that resemble high legs. so now lets go to another example snakes, once they were lizards. with 4 legs (mabe more?) and walked, wow right, now they have lost the legs, but many snakes especally males have a remaining feature, a claw that is minapulated like a toe, left over from their hind feet. now this toe is there because of evolution. according to science you will have almost always a remaining feature some where of the previouse species you once where.

heres why i dont think humans and apes are as related as the blood work might suggest. all apes, have a bone in there male reporductive organ, not sotf tissue that becomes hardened as a male gets arroused va blood build up, but an actuall bone. as in it dies flesh rots and it still has a bone there. a feature like that wont just go away. it will stay, we dont have that feature. why would we lose it? its not just that, we dont have a lot of the features that apes have that make them survivors. and according to evolution we lost these features long befor we developed the tools that apes even some what use (pointed stick poke things ugg ugg).

bottem line is, scientist are often overly truested with information, and if you ask a college proffesor, what they think, check their research becase many are such byass *explitive* that they cant see though their own *explitive*... its just like right now theres evidence of so manythings that are considered myth or legend, and science can prove them real and people have, yet main strem science which in this country is run by oppressive liberals and their magical herbs (no offince to pot smokers but i dont care to learn from some one who was high when they were reading the information, it makes for a funny story but the meaning of the knowlage isnt there). and these stuck up *explitives*... dont know a plant from a fungi.

2006-09-07 20:31:08 · answer #1 · answered by Pyros South Texas Rejection 2 · 0 2

How can you say the skeptics are wrong about God when God does NOT exist? Creationism is a lazy explanation came up by ignorant people who run around buck naked, read Genesis and see the inconsistensies, they can't even get the correct sequence of creation straight in the stupid book...

2006-09-08 03:23:32 · answer #2 · answered by TheFatIdiot 3 · 2 0

Who cares if it is creation or evolution. Are'nt you just glad to be here. No matter what happens, no one will truly know. The key word is explanation which equals best interpretation that suits a particular individual.

On the other hand, we did not have computers and cell phones 100 years ago, so the human race is evolving.

Was man we created to evolve? Sure.

2006-09-08 03:25:35 · answer #3 · answered by One Love 1 · 2 0

If creationism is fact then why has every federal court and the Supreme Court ruled evolution must be taught in public schools. They've concluded that creationism has no scientific purpose. But you probably think Supreme Court Justices are imbeciles.

2006-09-08 03:20:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If we assume the universe was created, then it’s reasonable to assume there was a creator. That’s as far as science has progressed today, but just look how far religion has progressed.

Religion states (fact) there was a creator called God, that God still exists, God also created places called Heaven & Hell, God wrote an instruction book called the Bible, God will banish evil people to Hell, God will send good people who follow the Bible to Heaven, that people referred to in the Bible (like Jesus) will return to Earth, and a whole raft of other statements of fact. That’s right, religious fact, not assumptions.

Now tell me truthfully, if science doesn’t even know yet whether the universe was created or not, but religious believers state: “not only was the universe created by God, here’s a whole lot more proof and facts to go with it, what do you think?

Either religious believers just have vivid imaginations or suffer from a common mental illness. I think commonsense and logic would suggest that religious believers are mentally handicapped.

2006-09-08 03:13:00 · answer #5 · answered by Brenda's World 4 · 0 3

They are not wrong to doubt the existence of gods.
Many cultures on this planet have many different gods and beliefs, so that makes your question at least incomplete.
But since no one has shown any evidence for the existence of any god, I don't see how you can say skeptics are wrong.

For example, when you can convince all christians, muslims and jews, who follow the same god, to agree; then we can talk further.
Ok?

2006-09-08 03:15:19 · answer #6 · answered by RjKardo 3 · 1 1

Man, don't you watch the history channel documentarys. Evidence is being found every day to prove Biblical writings.

2006-09-08 03:32:53 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Creation doesnt explain anything with practical thought. Its asanine. There are countless scientists that can explain how it is that everything exists today. Stay in school, and out of church.

2006-09-08 03:25:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Skeptics try to find logical, scientific explanations for everything even their own soul. That's where they start going wrong.

2006-09-08 03:18:02 · answer #9 · answered by Equinox 6 · 1 2

since your assumption is unproven, the rest of your argument (for lack of a better word) is null and void.

2006-09-08 03:47:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers