Probably b. Not directly, of course. But the Muslim world would justifiably go apeshit, and countries with Muslim communities would have a reason to become either internally oppressive or to rattle their sabers at the nuking country (I assume the USA) to avoid an insurgency.
Who would anyone want to nuke Mecca? Mecca isn't the problem. That's like nuking Calvary because of Hitler.
We can blame Islam because it's less elusive than the real targets. It's also a convenient way to distinguish "us"from "them", despite the fact that it's not very accurate.
History shows us that when the Romans gutted Jerusalem, they only caused Judaism to spread, adapt and evntually thrive.
The last thing the world needs now is more martyrs on either side.
2006-09-07 20:00:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Johnny Tezca 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
It wouldn't destroy Islam. Islam is a religion and a state of mind, not an object. It can't be destroyed without destroying its millions of followers. And not all follower of Islam are evil terrorists. Just the radical ones that are hell bent on killing anyone that does not practice their style of religion.
Back to you question though.
If Mecca was nuked by terrorists, I would say D. Governments worldwide would finally take the war on terror a little more seriously, if a terrorist group or nation finally set off a nuke and destroyed a city.
Mark my words, I fully believe that this will happen someday to some city in the world.
2006-09-07 20:02:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Microsoft Bob 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
E. Anarchy
Because no one would be able to fan tom the horror of a people who would destroy a religious site. Even though the person or group responsible were identified not one person would believe it. The finger of blame would go on for centuries fueled by an inability to deal with the emotional and spiritual upheaval.
plus to destroy one religion would set in motion the chain of events that would destroy ALL symbols of faith.
Some of the sites as I see it that would suffer this type of stupidity would be as follows.
Rome
Jerusalem
Salt Lake City
Tibet
Taj Mahal
To name a few, and to think the question you ask now is a thought that is held by a few unbalanced individuals. Sad isn't it?
2006-09-07 20:10:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
None of the above,. The Jews tried to Destroy it in the early days on Mecca, stampeded elephants into Mecca as their followed, History records that black bats came down from the sky’s and scared all away and latching onto their Army. Mecca is the center of the earth.. Educate yourself and you might appreciate it.. though you will know exactly why it’s there when you die as no one lives for ever.. your time = your crime..
2006-09-07 20:02:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Why can't you people just answer the question??? Anyway, I think it would be E, because a holy place to many would be destroyed and people would be placing blame on anyone and everyone and it'd be a very chaotic time.
2006-09-07 20:00:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by reid296 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
[105:1-5] Let not man be intoxicated with power or material resources: they cannot defeat the purpose of God. So Abrahah Ashram found to his cost. His sacrilegious attack on the holy Fane of God brought about his own undoing: what seemed but frail destroyed his mighty hosts in a day!
105: The Elephant
105:1 Hast thou not seen how thy Lord dealt with the owners of the Elephant ?
105:2 Did He not bring their stratagem to naught,
105:3 And send against them swarms of flying creatures,
105:4 Which pelted them with stones of baked clay,
105:5 And made them like green crops devoured (by cattle) ?
2006-09-07 19:57:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
LOL--you forgot 'dry up all the oil' didn't you?
The West doesn't control mideast oil. The mideastern people do. Israel is on the only patch of godforsaken desert over there iwth no oil in it.
Eat your heart out, Mecca will never be nuked.
2006-09-07 19:55:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
that would never happened.because Allah says he will protect the Kaaba.people have try to to it in the past.but Allah exposed their plans and they usually died some horrible death like getting struck by lighting
2006-09-07 20:58:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I often wonder this as well. It seems it would either dishearten Muslims or 'wake a sleeping giant'. I don't know which.
It seems prudent to threaten this, but not actually carry through with it. That way you instill fear, without necessarily enraging them to action.
2006-09-07 20:03:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by lenny 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
depends on who it is blamed on. if any western country is implicated it will unite the muslim world against the west. if it is known that terrorists did it, the muslim world will kill them, then unite against the west while they have the momentum.
2006-09-07 19:54:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Stand-up Philosopher 5
·
2⤊
0⤋