English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If so, what do you think about it?

2006-09-07 17:00:05 · 4 answers · asked by ? 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

4 answers

I was impressed with it. I think it fits into the bible time line perfectly as the time is not about the age of the earth, but all LOST needing to be SAVED back to the perfect that it was. So Ahmose at time of Moses in year 2513 [ 1553 before Christ ] to year 2553 [ 1513 before Christ ], then onto Solomon less 1Ki.6:1 480 years, 36 years to 1Ki.11:42 at death of Solomon is 997 before Christ, the Judah kings go into the 391st year to end 606 years before Christ and Cyrus was on the scene 536, Greece 336, Macabees 164 and Rome in Judah 62 years before Christ, so it really does fit. Matt.1:1-17; The
genealogy of Jesus is perfect as far as I am concerned. The bible fits all the time spans as age of sun and the whole works with animals here long before man.

2006-09-07 22:16:13 · answer #1 · answered by jeni 7 · 0 0

I watched it at History Channel. Honestly it does serve me the right to say that there is no miracle that cannot be explained scientifically. I agree with Deepak Chopra when he said, "Miracle of yesterday is technology today." One good reason why we do not need so much the presence of many prophets.. since we already have meteorologists who can predict the weather, scientists and doctors who are almost at the edge of discovering cures for all sickness that before only Christ can heal, we have cell phones and cell sites that can make us easily communicate with one another now that mental telepathy is hardly working even between twins.

2006-09-08 01:08:43 · answer #2 · answered by Rallie Florencio C 7 · 0 0

Is this about the Thrash Metal band Exodus? They were awesome!

2006-09-08 00:03:09 · answer #3 · answered by mr_mayat 3 · 0 0

I thought it was just a bunch of hoolabaloo. Trying to make science work the bible stories. There was a lot they did not tell you that was truth so that what they did tell you was taken as truth.
Bunk, all bunk.

2006-09-08 00:02:42 · answer #4 · answered by melrae1116 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers