English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ALIPAC is sponsoring a BOYCOTT of the Miller Brewing Company for supporting the Illegal Alien Marches over the Labor Day weekend. http://www.millerboycott.com/ Should Miller Beer have to publically denounce Illegal Immigration, and take a stand against AMNESTY before the boycott is ended? Should they be forced to support Pro LEGAL Immigration groups, seeing as they egegiously gave $30,000 to racist pro-illegal immigration groups as a means to make amends with LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZENS?

Give me your honest views on this question. Also, if you agree with the boybott, please click on the link and sign up as a supporting Patriot American http://www.millerboycott.com/

2006-09-07 15:37:14 · 10 answers · asked by dreamthinker2000 1 in Politics & Government Immigration

10 answers

ok no more miller for me, didnt know about this and glad you told me will spread the word and get others to stop as well. this is something that should not be happening they should be supporting there own

2006-09-07 15:42:04 · answer #1 · answered by NoBama For Me 2 · 2 1

OK seriously, you should post the link to Miller's response as well, it took me about 5 links from the one you posted to find it.

Their response to a Chicago tribune article saying they gave money to an organization which helped organize the illegal supporter's march was that they had never done such a thing.

They had given money to a forum being held in Chicago on how to help people become citizens by following the law. They also said they will look even more carefully at who they donate to in the future.

That being said, assuming they did do what was alleged. There are citizens in this country who support amnesty. Should everyone or every business that supports those citizens be boycotted? I hope to god not. NOW, if they were giving money to ILLEGALS to help them march, that is a different story.

There are many different views in this country on this issue by citizens who have the RIGHT to voice those opinions, (even when WAY off the mark). I don't think ANYONE should be boycotted merely because they helped those citizens voice them. Not to mention, I am satisfied with their response. MGD anyone?

2006-09-07 16:08:08 · answer #2 · answered by grim reaper 5 · 1 1

I saw the funniest yet true thing on Link-TV today. It shows how Millers ( and others in the Beer industry-I don't remember all-)is using more Robots and less people to work--and it feels-(its Corporation) that in 10 years-one person will run all their factories.
Isn't that a kick for all of us.

Yes-illegal is still illegal-the company should be penalized-and I think have its business license removed.

Thank-you for link-I will look at it.

2006-09-07 16:58:31 · answer #3 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 1 0

Noo

Miller Brewing Company
Should Continue Their Practices

Miller Brewing Company
Should Suffer The Consequences
Of Any Of Their Actions

2006-09-07 16:06:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Forget illegal aliens. They should renounce their beer. It sucks! BTW...how can you name a beer "Geniune Draft" when it comes from a bottle? Makes no sense!

2006-09-07 15:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

That's it - I'm drinking Bud Light!!

2006-09-07 16:12:05 · answer #6 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1 0

Hey Grim.. they don't want the truth.. they can't handle the truth..

2006-09-07 17:04:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes they should and they are all ready trying to slither out of what they have done

2006-09-07 15:41:14 · answer #8 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 2 1

No, I'm not offended.

2006-09-07 15:51:15 · answer #9 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 1 1

if they do, then.. who's going to make the beer?

2006-09-07 15:41:00 · answer #10 · answered by etherberg 3 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers