Not if a legitimate candidate shows up on the ballot. Unfortunately I don't see another Perot or other person with the independent financial strength to make a strong run of things.
2006-09-07 15:18:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
During the last presidential campaign I didn't cast a vote for John Kerry because I thought he could win. I earmarked my vote to counteract a particular person's vote for Bush. I was attempting to cancel out the vote of Rush Limbaugh. I know that's a pretty ignorant way to look at things. But i could have stayed away from the polls and not exercised my constitutional right to vote. I would have been disrespecting the lives of all the dead service men that have died to give us the right to participate in the election of the governing body of this country. Any one that campaigns for public office starts out entrenched in politics. It's the downside to the 2 party system. But overall it's a small price to pay to have the opportunity to be able to vote during an election knowing that a particular candidate has no chance to win. But allowing you the opportunity to cancel out the vote of the Rush Limbaugh's, and Sean Hannity's of the world.
2006-09-07 16:44:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by InDyBuD2002 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the initiating do your research to discover the party that "basically" represents your way of wondering. customarily, Republicans believe in decrease taxes (even no matter if it truly is for the wealthy), a lot less authorities (even though it will be demanding pressed for instance it at the moment) and construction u.s. by technique of being company pleasant. Democrats customarily, believe extra in man or woman rights (in certain circumstances on the cost of maximum individuals), taxing the businesses and giving the breaks to the man. Republicans are in many cases extra conservative (professional existence, constitutional modification defining marriage), Democrats extra liberal (professional determination, gay rights, stem cellular research) Being an smart human being you'll opt to look into applicants, no longer in basic terms the universal ones. And once you've the time artwork to help the only you've faith in. Get your sources from more desirable than one venue. FOX information is amazingly professional Republican, ABC information quite a lot less professional Democrat. yet take each and every thing that's reported with a grain of salt, research their balloting heritage, no longer in basic terms what they say. Their significant purpose on the instantaneous's to get helps, and fiscal backing to be the only to get the nomination from their party. enable's settle for it, although Ralph Nader, Ross Perot and John Anderson can run as Independents out of the significant flow activities, the most acceptable risk for victory is with between both significant activities. solid success along with your determination and welcome to the circus!
2016-11-06 21:09:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since at least one of the candidates, and more like all of them, has a long background in politics, you could say they are all entrenched, and have been for years. Who else ya gonna vote for?
2006-09-07 15:19:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by dathinman8 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do believe we will have another of the same only a different party. I pray for a civil uprising one day so we can take our Government back from tenured criminals in office. So far I think in my life time, George W Bush is the filthiest President to date. He does make Nixon look like a choir Boy.
2006-09-07 15:56:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No purpose in voting. Corrupt politicians already made plans to overpopulate, exploit and enrich the already wealthy.
There is no place in this country today, to be a separatist. Don't you think it's time for change?
2006-09-07 15:34:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by SLOWTHINKER 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
not if i can help it.
but who will be running that is not entrenched.
all i can say about who i will be voting for in 2008 is i will vote for any living person on this planet except hillary clinton.
2006-09-07 15:17:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by arkie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about you, but I'm tired of "Washington insiders"
I want an "outsider".. with the capacity and connections to raise tens of millions of dollars. Right.
2006-09-07 15:21:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if he is not a crooked S.O.B. like Bush
2006-09-07 15:17:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
0⤊
0⤋