English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Cheap, undocumented, unregulated labor will destroy the unions.
Democrats rely heavily on campaign contributions from the same unions.

Pro-illegal is supportive of big business, Pro-union is against big business.

How can the democrats continue to maintain both positions?

2006-09-07 09:21:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

15 answers

I would like to know where you got the idea that Democrats were pro illegal. Most that I talk to say the word illegal means not legal and therefore what you are saying is either an out and out lie or a fabrication of what is truthful. It is your appointed president that wants to give them amnesty.

2006-09-07 09:25:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

The liberal side of things wants to give the world a big cookie, and make it 'all better'. The conservative side, reasoning with cynicism born of experience and observation, would like to close and lock the door and have the rest of the world tend to itself for a change. In between, people wanna do business with others,
sooo there's this 'compromise' thing...

2006-09-07 10:11:28 · answer #2 · answered by gokart121 6 · 1 0

I'm liberal and I'm against any illegal immigration.I'm against amnesty,I'm for closing the borders.Oh and I'm pro union....I never said I didn't want the Minute Men to shoot,who's doing all that talking for liberals.I am not a republican sheep neither am I a undecided liberal.I know what I want and I know who I'm voting for.. Stop trying to think all Liberals are sheep like you tunnel vision republicans

2006-09-07 09:51:02 · answer #3 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 1 1

Who might want to have idea that this kind of radical anti-existence, anti-kin candidate, anti-Christian might want to with out word come out of nowhere (with little or no adventure) and run for the utmost place of work in our land? It’s significant for individuals to understand precisely the position Barack Obama stands on abortion, because abortion is more desirable than only a "Catholic situation." it truly is between the mandatory themes individuals must be maximum in contact about. america replaced into depending on the rights to “existence, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” and individuals have spent the previous 2 centuries in view that attempting to stay as a lot as those founding ideas. First got here disagreements over the pursuit of happiness — non secular and fiscal liberty. Then, over slavery. in the present day’s massive conflict is over the biggest proper: the right to existence. Obama’s votes and valid positions deny the right to existence to three kinds of people: the unborn, the “by risk” born and, a minimum of in a unmarried case, the guy “not worthy.” the theory that there is a creed on the middle of u . s . a . replaced into proper expressed with the help of Abraham Lincoln contained in the Gettysburg deal with. “4 score and 7 years in the past,” he suggested, “our fathers further forth in this continent a sparkling united states, conceived in liberty, and devoted to the proposition that each human being adult men are created equivalent.” He referred to as the Civil conflict a attempt to even if “any united states, so conceived and so dedicated, can lengthy bear.” u . s . a . remains present procedure that try. yet, like a opposite Lincoln, a sparkling guy from Illinois seeks the presidency, human being who's engaged in a conflict hostile to the proposition that each human being adult men are created equivalent, and endowed with the help of their author with the right to existence.

2016-11-25 19:30:32 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You one track minded Republicans. Unlike you, not all liberals think the same way. We are not as simple as you. Our opinions vary on a wide variety of subjects, thats why we are more progressive. I dont consider myself pro-illegal, but I am intelligent enough to understand their situation and the benefits that they provide to our economy. Also we cant have people like you patroling our borders!!

2006-09-07 09:47:44 · answer #5 · answered by maurcal 2 · 3 1

Defeatistacrats/Demoncraps have no stance on anything unless it hurts the USA and our American lay of life
Then again the Unions are the same way. The Unions refuse to check SS# to insure legal members thus poking their members in the eye as illegal alien invader Union employees help keep wages down. Union members require SS# checks of your Union's members. As all employers should have to.
When did a illegal alien invader ever get shot by a minuteman???????????????????????????????????????????/

2006-09-07 09:30:31 · answer #6 · answered by buzzy360comecme 3 · 0 3

I'm not pro-illegal

I'm pro-legalizing and unionizing the "illegals"

2006-09-07 09:27:13 · answer #7 · answered by anonacoup 7 · 4 1

I am not pro-illegal. Pro-union, yes, but not pro-illegal.

Bush is though. Obvouisly.
Is HE a liberal? No.

2006-09-07 09:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

If the illegals get amnesty, then they will be legal and will have to get the minimum wage. This makes American workers look less expensive. Also, once legalized, these exploited Mexicans would make great candidates for unions.

2006-09-07 09:27:17 · answer #9 · answered by Brand X 6 · 1 3

What makes you think democrats are "pro illegal"? Because we don't want minutemen shooting them at the border? God forgive us for not letting rednecks go on a killing spree.

2006-09-07 09:27:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers