Are you excited yet? LOL
2006-09-07 07:08:34 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I was feeling a little schoolhouse rockish.
2006-09-07 07:10:45 · update #1
I had some shrooms on my burger, sorry.
2006-09-07 07:11:36 · update #2
Alright, whoever gave me thumbs down needs to take their thumb and shove it )*(
2006-09-07 07:14:19 · update #3
Jean Jean made a machine. Jo Jo made it go. Art Art let a fart and blew the whole damn thing apart.
2006-09-07 07:11:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
confident, in accordance to evolution we ought to constantly get smarter. The degree of human intelligence is many times gauged with how innovative his "gadget kits" are. Granted we've collective awareness by the years and we've outfitted from the floor up, flints, bows and arrows to digital desktops and area rockets. yet does that rather propose we are smarter than human beings from the say the Bronze age? we've greater literacy costs now, greater human beings consistently interpreting and our society progresses by psychological improvements and achievements by making use of persons. meaning people who're smarter are favoured greater in society greater often than no longer. yet there is yet another element to contemplate, those people who're scientists, engineers, spend greater time working in academia than say start up a kinfolk. Its hardship-loose awareness that a female in the artwork tension or who is going by scientific college are greater probably to have babies on the age of 35 or 40 than a extreme college drop out who has approximately 3-4 little ones. As a society the human beings who're fairly greater challenged intellectually are having greater little ones at an in the previous age, which might develop that component of the inhabitants exponentially, at the same time as that of greater cerebral anybody is stagnant. What outcomes might those have sooner or later? we'd easily be getting dumber at the same time. There could be fewer opportunities that an "Einstein" could be born sooner or later.
2016-10-14 10:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by winstanley 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is not evolution but regression is the the explanation for the link between humans and monkeys, if you have any doubt then jut check GWB and Condi Rice.
2006-09-07 07:51:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I evened out the thumbs for you.
2006-09-07 07:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the soul has evolved fast enough to keep our minds evolution from destroying us. Better luck next time I guess.
2006-09-07 08:39:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution, evolution is the solution to how we got so smart and caused this pollution?
Nope.
2006-09-07 07:23:32 · answer #6 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Evolution will balance things out too by reducing the population.
2006-09-07 07:10:44 · answer #7 · answered by unchainmenow 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Haha......good theory.
Looks like it huh? We're a bunch of dumb asses huh? We not only polluted...but also made life to where we have to work almost all the time to live....how stupid we are..haha...me included you guys! No hate mail!
2006-09-07 07:13:34 · answer #8 · answered by Me 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
All you need is a good backbeat and you got a hit
2006-09-07 07:18:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
So far, so good. write the rest of the song and get back to me.
2006-09-07 07:15:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋