I promise I will not vote for GW Bush in the next Presidential election...I hope you are happy, I am doing it just because of your well thought out argument.
But, I may vote Republican in the election. I hope McCain wins...
2006-09-07 05:53:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by almost3am 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. You don't know. In fact, you don't know if Clinton didn't have secret prisons. And what is so wrong about having secret prisons for terrorist leaders? They have no legal standing either by law or by Geneva conventions.
2. Bush did not lie - the justifications and decisions were made based on the best intelligence that we and our allies had at the time. That's not lying. Calling it lying only shows a lack of intelligence. Period.
3. What 'rule of law' did Bush and the GOP break? If it has happened so often, perhaps you could actually tell us what they are and prove they were actual violations of the law. NSA wiretapping from phone numbers found in terrorist computers that were calling US numbers? That's wartime signal intelligence, which has never required judicial authorization. The ruling against it recently will be overturned because every other judge has reviewed it thoroughly and found it in compliance with the Constitutionally accepted powers of the president.
So what do I think? I think you have your facts wrong, and have let your biases and feelings cloud your judgement and your ability to discern reality.
2006-09-07 05:08:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
It is always the same old thing with you libs. How bad Bush is, how wrong Bush was. Do you not understand that you can not win elections by just fighting one man. You must use your brains and come up with ideas that the common man and woman can support. I wish both parties would go back to doing this. When the dems and reps both came up with ideas we had a strong country and not nearly as much hate.
2006-09-07 13:05:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why would the presence of secret military prisons that hold known Terrorists, have any effect on your day to day life. Could it be that the President and the CIA and other anti terrorist organizations operating on your leftist behalf, would not want known terrorist cells to know of these secret locations? Things are covert for a reason. Maybe we should just let them all out and we can sit down and we could all smoke legalized marijuana and talk about ways we can all convert to Islam.
2006-09-07 05:03:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by fire_side_2003 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
that's instructive to guage Bush Sr with Bush Jr. at the same time as Bush Sr prosecuted the Gulf warfare, he constrained the point of the warfare to easily loose Kuwait, or maybe at the same time as he had the prospect to bypass into Baghdad, he stopped the warfare and pulled out. there became closure, the job, as initially reported, became carried out. Bush Jr, on the different hand, did not obviously outline the aims of the Iraq warfare, he left it open ended. there is no closure. he's made it distinctly a lot no longer plausible for everyone to be sure at the same time as "victory" has been carried out. at the same time as does "victory" ensue once you're in basic terms occupying a rustic along with your military? Bush Jr has painted himself right into a nook with this one, blinded by technique of a naive about how superb the Iraqis would sense about him and u.s.. This breathtaking naivete is now being uncovered by technique of numerous authors, collectively with the present, Woodard.
2016-11-06 20:00:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
George W. Bush is a moran. He should be impeached and executed for high treason of the United States of America.
Hes too stupid to think, he paid his way through elementry, middle, high school. and college, if not he would be stuck in the first grade!
He was never elected either time. He LOST the popular vote TWICE!
2006-09-09 11:32:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
This it true. However, I would like to remind everyone that Penis Clinton lied about the justification of wars too. If there is anything usefully of impeaching Bullshit, it would be in favor of a new president who would have the US quit NATO and withdraw US support for the ICTY. On this subject, I would like to appeal to all South Africans to contact me on the matter of forming a new political party with the aim of bringing Injustice Goldstone to justice.
2006-09-07 04:57:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I promise not to vote for George Bush in 2008. Are you happy now?
2006-09-07 08:00:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Like Answerman says, lets get one branch of government first - GET OUT AND VOTE IN THE MID-TERM ELECTIONS!
They are the most important elections right now.
2006-09-07 04:59:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by qwondre 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is all done in 2008 sooner if we take back one of the houses of congress. The election of 2006 is far more important the the one in 2008 right now.
2006-09-07 04:50:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋