Yes, but only after his rib surgery.
I pity the fool who stares at Adams belly-button instead of the fig leaf.
2006-09-07 04:27:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When one considers that the DNA is a kind of construction map for offspring - it would be most likely Adam had a belly button. The DNA, is a marvelous technology developed by God.
Non the less - if you want an absolute yes with no chance for error - thats not going to happen. No one is alive today who knew Adam.
As for why God would give him one since Adam was the prototype for generations after him - again I suppose since God was the master engineer behind the process may have wanted it that way.
I mean - did the first computer have a logo stamped on it? Why? The prototype itself would not be marketed so why bother? Because the maker in his wisdom wanted to and pondering it does not change the fact that the computer did or did not have a logo.
Kapeesh? No? I piddy da foo who argues wit me! :-)
2006-09-07 11:41:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Victor ious 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's an interesting question. I don't know the answer for sure, only God does, but I would have to say no because he was never in the womb, therefore he wouldn't have an umbilical cord. So no, no belly button.
2006-09-07 11:20:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by 3m 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
CERTAINLY NOT!!! Adam was NOT born of a woman, so he didnt need an umblical cord to feed him in the womb, without the cord, (which is cut after birth) how could he or why would he need a belly button??
2006-09-07 11:24:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by busola h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, and the real reason would surprise you, regardless that Adam and Eve were our first parents on earth.
2006-09-07 11:24:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Guitarpicker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since all humans look alike in the basics then he had a belly buton. And what does it matter to you if you do not believe? Why do you care?
2006-09-07 11:18:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by wolfy1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course, when god made Adam ,He made him complete. Why make him without one and have to go back and add one later?
2006-09-07 11:20:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since we are all apart of Adam and Eve and we have one I'm gonna go with "YES".
2006-09-07 11:17:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mrs. Butler ♥2 B♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know why it's important, but I'd be led to believe he didn't simply because he was created and not born of a woman.
2006-09-07 12:24:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by bigvol662004 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well the only one who knows that for sure is God. But I would have to assume that he did!
2006-09-07 11:17:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋