Are you registered to be an Organ Donor?

Question

In the US you can register to be an organ donor at almost any government office. They will only use your organs for people who need them to extend their lives. If you haven't yet registered will you consider it. If so why? And if not why?

I just wanted to add that my wife received a kidney transplant 2.5 years ago. She was lucky to receive a live organ from her brother, very close tissue match. She still has to take immunosuppresents at $800.00 per month. A live organ has at least a 50% higher chance for surivival, but the latest news is hinting that will drop to 30%. I respect everyone's opinion on the this subject. It inspiring to see so much interest. Would this information change your answer in any way?

Answer 1

I am registered, and it's on my driver's license.
Although, I understand now that my organs can't be used since I was treated for Lymphoma. They won't let me give blood any more either. I guess because Lymphoma can come back at any time and you might not know you have it. Or, maybe it's because of the chemo and radiation, I don't know. But I'd like to help, and I think organ donation is a great thing to do.

Answer 2

I am not an organ donor, however I am on the National Bone Marrow Donor listing, and have, as of this time, donated 547 units through the Red Cross. As a current apheresis donor, I donate 24 times per year.

I figure by the time I pass on at 100+ everything will be too worn out to be of use. This assumes that I avoid fatal accidents and foolish actions.

Answer 3

I'm a firm believer in organ donation. My father required a liver transplant 9 years ago and if it weren't for donors, he wouldn't be with us still.

I figure that after I'm gone, I'm not going to be using anything, so why not let other people benefit? It seems like such a waste to let people suffer while usable organs are getting buried or cremated.

Answer 4

I am not, and I have specific reasons for my choice. First of all, everyone thinks they are going to save so many people when they donate, that is not the case. The only way your vital organs will be transplanted into another person is if you are being kept alive by artificial means. It is very unlikely that most of us will die in a situation to be on life support, wherein out organs could be used. It is a common misconception thinking that if you simply die at home or in a hospital that your organs are going to be transplanted into another human, they are not. ONLY if you are declared brain dead while on life support can your organs be harvested and put into another human. Otherwise, your organs are put on a refridgerated meat truck to be hauled off to who knows where. Plus, the team who do the harvesting completely and totally mutilate the body, leaving behind an immense amount of work for the funeral director to have to put them back together. When you are a skin and tissue donor, they remove allof your long bones in your arms and legs and replace them with PVC pipes. Mind you, bones are not transplanted into another body. Just a personal choice, and I have chosen not to donate.

Answer 5

we've a gadget that prioritises in protecting with clinical desire. The organ is portion of their average NHS remedy which the conventional public have a precise to acquire, and is (with any success) funded through their tax contributions. It sorts a worry-free "precise to life" and that i trust ought to no longer be tormented through someone's' personality, options, way of life, selfishness etc. those who donate at the prompt are not continually "more beneficial positive human beings" or more beneficial deserving. trust it or no longer it really is in our maximum proper pastimes to maintain those worry-free rights even if if it seems unjust that a lifelong donor loses out. Letting our authorities limit who receives a organ would please them to no end. i doesn't be taken aback in the journey that they utilized "powerful discrimination" or different both irrational judgements. both way, that would set a precedent for the authorities to unsettle the founding ideas of our NHS and screw us over left, precise and centre for options we make, or cut back issues in protecting with value. we doesn't be those on the receiving end of any reductions made out of "cuts". Our taxes would proceed to upward thrust on a similar fee because that's not about how a lot issues value yet how a lot they could extract without an outcry at anybody time. even if, there should be more beneficial incentives to donate. I merely opt to die in peace if i'm no longer likely to get something for my problems. i'd nicely be persuaded in the journey that they quite made it nicely worth my even as to bear an organ harvest. If the NHS validated that it really is being run proper then i'd also be more beneficial probable to hitch. perchance spend the promoting money on small NI rebates for donors. That way, non-donors pay a tiny bit more beneficial for the well being service they use yet nonetheless get the right to acquire an organ ought to they prefer it. this should be set as a share of average NI contributions. even if it really is a service for all and should be honest, we are no longer paying a similar volume firstly. That way, no one dies for his or her perspectives yet donors are rewarded. i'd help a scheme like that.

Answer 6

I am an organ donor. If I cant use them anymore, then why not let someone else. Its not like I believe that we are going to come up with a way to raise people from the dead.

Answer 7

Yes

Answer 8

No, but I would donate my dead body to a medical college. I don't think my sorry organs would do anybody any good.

Answer 9

Yes I hope someone can have a better life because of my donation.

Answer 10

Yes, If they can't be donated to someone I want them to be used for medical research.