Does grammar matter?

Question

In sites like this does grammar matter? If you manage to get your point across so its understandable does a spelling mistake or wrong use of a word matter?

I wrote 'have you took' instead of 'have you taken'

In ma opinion this is understandable as to what I meant

So for all those stuck up wee minded folk out there that feel they have to pick up on minor tiny wee grammar differences like this one, you really have to get a life!

I dont bother when the americans say 'yall'

As for 'Dumber' ok I misspelt it! I hold ma hands up, poke me in the eye and smack ma ***

Answer 1

texans say yall. I don't think anone else do.
Grammar is in the eye of the beholder.

Answer 2

in the real world i think it does, for sites like this it's nice but not a requirement, i read past the grammar and more interested in what's being said. Besides in some odd way some mistakes are quite appealing, not just a screen and keyboard. If it's really crass though then it would grate abit. To moan about someone's minor grammatical errors is very petty.

Answer 3

Of course grammar and spelling matter. Why should folk have to interpret what you are trying to say? You should be clear. An understanding of the grammatical rules of your language allows you to be articulate.
The American use of the phrase 'y'all' is irrelevant. It is not a spelling mistake, merely a way of expressing in English a peculiarity of their accent, much the same as your use of the words 'wee' for 'small' and 'ma' for 'my' is an indication of yours.

Answer 4

Yes, it matters.

The structure of a sentence, either written or spoken, is vital to convey not just the meaning but also the sense of the idea.

Of course one can go too far, adhering too strongly to outdated rules, which makes one sound like one is a stuck up git.

A sophisticated language, able to describe concepts as well as objects, places us above the rest of the creatures on this planet. Don't let it disintegrate into structureless grunts.

And there is a spelling checker built into Yahoo Answers. Use it.

Answer 5

Grammar is important when you are trying to communicate with people. If you write a sentence incorrectly, people might not understand what you are trying to say. It's a basic skill which enables people to communicate with other people and it's important to get it right, in context. Wrong grammar doesn't matter here, but in a job application, for example, it does.

Answer 6

The reason we have standards for grammar and spelling is so that we can get our point across. Sure, you can communicate despite a few mistakes, but the farther you stray from standard usage, the more chance you have of miscommunication.

So yes, grammar and spelling matter.

JMB

Answer 7

i went on a blind date a few months back and this abnoxious guy was talking about grammar and that how kids these days have their own language because of shortcutting words on msn and texting. His theory is that soon the english language will no longer be english it will be gobble-de-goook! I just thought he was moronic to think that words in the language were going to be shortened to everything abbreviated and soon everyone will be grunting and sounding more and more like neanderthols and that actually we're becoming more primitive!

I didn't call him again

But no it doesn't matter on here- you're not on an interview

Answer 8

According to Modern Linguists like Goerge Yule and Derida, it doesn't matter much. The basic purpose of communication is to under stand and getting understood; if language helps in fulfilling this purpose without Grammar, its fine; as we see some times the gesture theory is even more helpful than language. But we can't discard grammar; we have to be specific in some cases like Nominative and Accusitive ........................

Answer 9

na,everyone is used to short hand form of writting and stuff these days so it's understandable but there are some people learning English and make it real hard to understand but that was part of his question on,how should it really be said in the english world,without him being corrected he would probaly have failed his exam,so grammar does have it's time and place. Normally I try have it all correct unless just sending a sms messages to friends that I know and know that they will understand what I am saying,but then sometimes when I do that in chat rooms or Yahoo Question's a lot of people can't understand what you have said.

Answer 10

The issue is one of perception. All the reader sees is the words on the screen. If one appears capable of utilizing the language properly, the perception is that one's mind is well-organized, and that one's thoughts are clear. The inference is then made that one's answers are more likely to be trustworthy.

As a comparison: If one requires water, water is water, whether sipped from a clean container, or sucked from a puddle.

Answer 11

Grammar does count. If we don't shop to grammatical policies then we are incomprehensible. The question stems from a properly-liked false impression of what 'Grammar' is. i think of the questioner is utilising it to intend 'a collection of policies of spelling and different writing conventions taught at school and in many cases held to be 'perfect' by the knowledgeable.' by this yardstick, somebody who is familiar with the place to place the apostrophe, is familiar with to no longer write 'He robbed my spouse and that i ...' etc. those Grammar policies are conventions agreed greater or les explicitly - they are policies of the 'do no longer walk on the grass' style. Grammar as a term used by linguists is a colection of policies of the 'The women all and sundry is people who supply delivery' style - i.e. no longer imposed in maximum cases from outdoors yet deduced from assertion of ways the language is used. hence, all spoken and written language could desire to conform with some 'grammar' - otherwise it does no longer be intelligible. distinctive policies ought to coach to categories of language use - however the policies are nonetheless there and nonetheless significant. If youngsters talk or write to eachother in a fashion you are able to no longer comprehend or do unlike, then which would be becasue the 'grammar' of their utterances isn't comparable to what you employ. i recently examine a newspaper article writen contained in the Nineteen Fifties the place an academic became bemoaning the 'ungrammatical' nature of his youngster's language. considered one of them mentioned to the different that 'i'm able to purely lend you a shilling'. the father became horrified that his (6 twelve months previous) had no longer mentioned 'i'm able to lend you purely a shilling'. for hundreds of years, one era has hung directly to the perception that it has a ethical monopoly on the 'real' state of the language. The language has been, to this point as such all and sundry is worried, 'going to the dogs' for hundreds of years. And English is a international language understood by greater human beings contained in the international than the different language ever. besides the indisputable fact that, on the subject count of wheter toddlers in US and uk faculties could study greater language skills - incredibly chatting with distinctive purpose audience, writing and language expertise. Yep, i'm with you on that one.