All tyrants have a slow rise to power and a 1000 innocent people put them up there by supporting the tyrant at the beginning of his/her reign of tyranny!
We are not that innocent. We are the real tyrants creating the tyrant !
Get it ?
No tyrant just shows up one day and says I am your brutal dictator let me have all your heads at once. Examine the process by which the tyrant gets up there and you will see the truth. We are the real tyrants!
2006-09-06 21:50:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by zamir 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agee with you.
We have a history of assisting certain groups that are trying to have a revolution but in Iraq's case, there was no revolution... the Iraqi ppl were not asking for help.
Btw, the last Iraqi civilian death count is 130,290... just so you know.
What also bothers me is that we condemn Saddam, as we should, for using chemical weapons on the Kurds because the Kurds were helping Iran in the war between Iran and Iraq. BUT, we fail to mention how we used chemical warfare in the Vietnam War known as Agent Orange.
It's all about Bush's double standard.
2006-09-07 12:24:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think thats what usuually heppens when you go to war. Thats usually why it's avoided. It seems like a lot in the short term of the war, but the overall savings is much larger.
2006-09-07 02:56:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam killed tens of thousand of people in the decades he was in power. In the few years since he's gone, hundreds of thousand of people have died.
Now, taking out Saddam was a political and strategic decision, and it may even have been a good idea. I have no opinion on that.
It's the foolish mistakes made since then that need re-thinking.
2006-09-07 02:25:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 Tyrant can kill many.
Saddam Hussian killed about 400,000 of his own people.
Stalin killed about 26,000,000 of his own people.
Mao Zee Dong killed about 100,000,000 of his own people.
If killing 1000 innocents can stop them before the really get rolling, then it is worth it.
2006-09-07 03:17:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hello, that one tyrant was killing tens of thousands. people like you let hitler get away with what he did for as long as he did
2006-09-07 02:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
"The needs of the many out way the needs of the few".
The question should be who lives and who dies, and who makes that decision
2006-09-07 04:34:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by ZULU45RM1664 3
·
0⤊
0⤋