2006-09-06 18:33:19 · 11 answers · asked by Evelyn B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Absolutely not; the government should not interfere with creative freedom, an extension of the right to free speech. Did I mention that the only caveat is if the exercise of that right does not infringe upon the rights of others? :-)
2006-09-07 07:34:35 · answer #1 · answered by Speedo Inspector 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The short answer is that they can't.
However if the movie has no rating many movie theaters won't accept it for viewing. Some "art house" movie theaters will though.
I also do not like that there is some anonymous panel somewhere deciding on their own solidarity how to rate a film. Maybe my idea of a G film isnt the same as theirs. Maybe a PG-13 film to me allows more sex or violence or one more instance of the word s**t.
2006-09-06 18:37:55 · answer #2 · answered by special-chemical-x 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. That is a violation of the First Amendment. They already rate the movies, that is as much as they should be allowed to do.
2006-09-06 18:36:59 · answer #3 · answered by Hippy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not as long as I am paying for it, the rating system is more than enough. This is the US, I am free to see what I want or to make a movie with whatever I want in it.
2006-09-06 18:36:08 · answer #4 · answered by searay092003 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO! The government controls too many aspects of our lives as it is. I'd like to know whatever happened to "for the people, by the people".
2006-09-07 07:57:45 · answer #5 · answered by Mollywobbles 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When movies are nothing more than a huge advertisement for liberal wackos like Michael Moore or Al "The world thanks that I lost" Gore, their movies should fall under the U.S. laws related to false advertisement. Or .... as they should do... they need to catalog their movies as FANTASY.
2006-09-06 23:39:44 · answer #6 · answered by Are_You_Stupid? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nor acording to our constitution. If he could, George would like to control movies, TV and everything else WORLDWIDE.
Thank Goodness, we have not lost all of our freedoms to him yet.
l
2006-09-06 18:40:38 · answer #7 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is style of a stupid question... yet i'm going to humor you thru answering besides maximum animals may be compelled to vote for whoever their proprietor needs. so as that would desire to form of be like balloting two times. which isn't allowed as for undomesticated animals: no they are able to't.
2016-12-12 04:01:44 · answer #8 · answered by endicott 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they shouldnt, like the saying "its only a movie"
2006-09-06 18:37:51 · answer #9 · answered by newyorktocountry 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2006-09-06 18:38:41 · answer #10 · answered by bigjohn B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋