2006-09-06 15:23:51 · 24 answers · asked by Professor Armitage 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes
Sadam promised to destroy all his WMDs at the end of the first Gulf war.. he didnt promise to only destroy ones made in the last 10 years... and even if they are 15 years old, they are still hazardous and potentially lethal (sounds kinda funtional to me)
2006-09-06 15:31:14 · answer #1 · answered by TLJaguar 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
LOL,No......
First we were told that Saddam had WMD, and that he even was working on a drone which could deliver a nuclear weapon to America. Rice said that we shouldn't wait for the mushroom cloud. Bush said we had to strike preemptively before a nation became an imminent threat. After WMD were not found, we were told we were bringing democracy to the country, by ridding it of a genocidal tyrant. Next, we were told that we were fighting terrorism over there so that it would not come to the United States. Then Bush and Cheney tried to associate Saddam Hussein with the 9/11 terrorists, so we were in Iraq to strike back at the 9/11 terrorists. Then we were told we were fighting to establish a "new Middle East" but that was not really defined, except as a place of modernity and "freedoms".. As of today, per Bush's most recent speech, it seems as though we are in Iraq fighting a global war on radical Islam. Who knows how long we get lied to,and what the next reason will be.....Do what Barbara should have made Bush Senior do-PULL OUT BUSH!!!
GET US OUT OF IRAQ!!!!!
2006-09-06 15:42:07 · answer #2 · answered by Holly 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, the ones we brought, and if that's not bad enough we also fertilized the breeding ground for the ethnic hatred there that has allowed it to flourish and grow...atta boy george, the best thing we could do now is to leave and let those crazy SOBs kill each other instead of us, then move back in and pick up the leftovers.
2006-09-06 15:34:55 · answer #3 · answered by Michael S 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Other countries in the Mideast were covertly giving information to the CIA all during the Clinton Administration.
WMD were prominently mentioned throughout eight years of the Clinton administration.
Now all the libs blame Bush. What short memories the libs have.
2006-09-06 15:32:40 · answer #4 · answered by Telcontar 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no, that was one of the many lies that bush told to start this stupid war because he had a personal vendetta to fulfill. they found "traces" of wmd's that were once there but not anymore. Bush said that he DID have them, not that they had "traces" of wmd's.
P.S. thank you so much Holly!! It's finally nice to see someone that knows bush is a liar besides me. Coming from a military wife, you guys should listen to this woman!
2006-09-06 16:24:06 · answer #5 · answered by cwilson_192002 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No one mentioned that George Bush senior gave the chemical weapons to Saddam to use against the Iranians, thats why they were sure they existed, because his administration had sent them over because they were afraid of the power shift if the Iranians won.
2006-09-06 15:51:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush just make that ******* story to attack Iraq , they is no ******* weapon in Iraq and Iraq people is dying without any reason.I hope that god will destroyed America because it not give any ******* benefit to world.America and their citizen is suck and they deserve more Katrina and Rita
2006-09-06 15:42:59 · answer #7 · answered by john l 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. They did find Weapons of Mass Deception.
2006-09-06 15:31:45 · answer #8 · answered by inpoetry1 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes! They were not nukes, but they did eventually find some chemical weapons as well as "moving" chemical labs to produce them. The labs were put into the back of large cargo trucks.
2006-09-06 15:35:01 · answer #9 · answered by armywifetp 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Big Brother saved our asses in Iraq. I thought otherwise once but a pig with some big dogs came around and convinced me otherwise. I LOVE BIG BROTHER.
2006-09-06 15:29:15 · answer #10 · answered by nothing 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋