Bush Bashing is not an answer. Answering this question my determine win or lose at the polls. If the radical liberals, who seem in control of the party, answer this they will appease the enemy as they do in Europe. Hillary is playing it smart by moving towards the center. What do you think?
2006-09-06 14:26:51 · 19 answers · asked by Search4truth 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
i think the democrats are going to piss and moan until they annoy the enemy to death. it sucks, in the beginning, EVERYONE was all for the war, now they are against it. That change of heart floods over to the troops and they lose their spirits. if we could just give them the support they need and cheer and holler and all that we did in the beginning, maybe it would be easier for them to give it their all and then perhaps the war could be won just a bit faster.
2006-09-06 14:45:54 · answer #1 · answered by Cyrus 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
substitute is extraordinarily much consistently good. Republicans could awaken and reinvigorate. They spent lots time on morals themes that even the ethical have been given uninterested. yet no longer something dramatic will take place different than attempting to frustrate Bush as we circulate directly to Hillary. Democrats will now could take a number of the blame for what happens because of the fact with Pilosi as speaker of the abode, they're going to could shop her contained. maximum new Democrats are closer to the midsection than to the left so Pilosi could be in for a no longer undemanding run. the vast situation different than the conflict would be immigration. On paper, we could have an open border as quickly because of the fact the Dems take administration. somewhat, we can come across a great style of Dems himming and hawing approximately why they help a secure border. Duh. every physique ever seen an unsecured border after 9/11? purely Vincente Fox and the Activists. believe me.
2016-09-30 10:14:31 · answer #2 · answered by sashi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can tell you that.
1. Bash the President
2. Appease everyone.
3. Listen to terrorist pledges and promises.
4. talk endlessly and accomplish little.
5. Depend on the UN
6. if all of the above fail blame President Bush again.
2006-09-06 15:11:39 · answer #3 · answered by Kevin P 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I wonder if its worth engaging in a dialoge with you. But I would address the social, environmental and political problems that make terrorism attracitve and compelling.
I hate to sound utopian, but having a better and just society that does not create wars of choice for political gain would be a good place to begin. Literacy, education, health care, employment, and environmental protection are places to start. I could never support Hillary.
2006-09-06 15:19:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
How about starting at home and locking the gates? Start here and secure the borders, ports, airports, and immigration policies. When those are secure, move out to secure points of embarkation, shipyards abroad, etc. Help secure old soviet nuclear material. All the while doing the legwork to investigate real threats and confront them, one at a time.
Sweeping agendas, like invading Iraq to get a few Al Qedas, is just assinine. 90% of the insurgents are Iraqis, who were pretty well contained by Saddam, until we showed up.
2006-09-06 14:32:41 · answer #5 · answered by normobrian 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Democrats' strategy for winning the war? Same as France's...wave the white flag and beg for mercy! How do you say "I surrender!" in French?
2006-09-06 14:46:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Find the Islamic Fascist's and kill them, we don't need to start a war with any country in particular, just get the guilty persons.
2006-09-06 14:39:01 · answer #7 · answered by Zen 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
First retire the firebrands Blair and Bush as step number one. And not attack nations who have done nothing to us number two . and concentrate on hotspots and state reforms for change (regimes that we support that are suppressing the freedoms of the people) and 3,instead of bombing the hell out of the neighbors get Israel to settle the issues with the neighbors and work toward having exchange instead of mass destruction (Mr, Olmert).
2006-09-06 14:35:48 · answer #8 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
They don't have a plan. When asked what thier plan is, they tell you everything that Bush has done wrong in thier opinion. THEY DON'T HAVE A CLUE.
2006-09-06 15:13:18 · answer #9 · answered by tiger 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should talk really, really, really nice to the people that want to convert us or cut our heads off. I, however, do not want to be the one to sit down and talk with them. I enjoy living too much.
2006-09-06 14:46:22 · answer #10 · answered by ouskip1998 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋