English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

This is just the insecure mothers who try living their broken dreams through their innocent children.
Also, the clothing companies make standard sized clothing for babies, calculated on the average size and weight of a baby by age. Babies that don't fit that average need "special" clothing therefore are no good for those company's.
Any parent wanting to make money from their kids should seriously look at history: Drew Barrymore, D'ferent Strokes cast, the ET guy, Shirley Temple, etc. They all probably felt used and were unable to live a normal childhood, yet more and more youth are just treated like money cows!!

2006-09-06 14:36:28 · answer #1 · answered by canguroargentino 4 · 0 0

That's not true....havent you noticed that the babies in ads in sales papers, tv, magazines, etc. are the cutest little things? They go for looks because i've never seen an ugly baby in the ads. And my godsister is in all of that modeling and stuff, and she's light skinned with curly hair.....she's beautiful.

2006-09-06 14:42:01 · answer #2 · answered by sha9609 2 · 0 0

Something is SO wrong with that. Babies are cute, who cares about their length and weight?

2006-09-06 14:27:48 · answer #3 · answered by mommysrock 4 · 0 0

aren't all babies chubby? "baby fat"
Yea that doesnt seem right? I wouldn't get my child involved in that! They would learn at an early age, weight and looks are 'everything'

2006-09-06 14:25:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think they should go by the face. who looks at a babys body?

2006-09-06 14:20:51 · answer #5 · answered by yayaloyaya 3 · 0 0

i think thats sooo stupid and wrong...b ut thats the way life is thats why theres all those actors out there...lol no talent but a nice face....wow lucky usa...

2006-09-06 14:45:05 · answer #6 · answered by cutenwild1769 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers