2006-09-06 11:46:13 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Just thought I'd ask because I had just read an article from a doctor saying all men should be Circumcised for health reasons because cervical cancer in Jewish women is rare.
So it wan't a flpent question.
2006-09-06 12:00:41 · update #1
I think a circumcised man is so much better. I had one boyfriend when I was 16 years old that was not circumcised. He was asian and i'm black. The sex was the same as any sex session, but the look of it was not a turn on. Guys that don't have this done to them really need to keep theirs cleaned a lot more. I hate to be funny about this, but it looks like their d*cks are wrapped in it's own personal condom. Every guy should have this done from the begining. It really is a health concern in the future.
2006-09-11 06:45:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The cervical cancer connection is very old and VERY INCORRECT. See the article (linked below) from the ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION web site that says that partner circ status has no bearing on cervical cancer.
There is now a vaccine for HPV, the virus that causes cervical cancer. What other supposed threats will have been disarmed by the time the baby that is mutilated today becomes sexually active?
-Ron
2006-09-07 17:46:03 · answer #2 · answered by tlctugger 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gosh! Why are men so worried about this?
Do you know how many times a day this question gets asked!?!? The majority of reponse's for this will be "Doesn't bother me" . . . because it's true. It makes no difference what so ever, unless in the rare case some girl is extremely picky on something. It makes no difference what so ever.
2006-09-06 18:51:19 · answer #3 · answered by Jessica - AKA - Carolina Girl 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is an indisputable FACT that the foreskin is the most nerve-rich portion of the male anatomy. Uncircumcised men enjoy sex more, and their partners enjoy sex more. One need only read surveys and research into the subject--where the partner had both experienced a cut and uncut penis. You cannot take surveys conducted in the United States, where nearly every boy is mutilated, seriously. THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED AND UNCIRCUMCISED PENIS! They are answersing with question to NO KNOWLEDGE!
Of course the penis feels more sensation when the skin is pulled back. That's what the foreskin is for! To keep the mucous membrane (head of the penis) moist, supple, and sensitive, so that sex is extremely pleasurable. Men who lack a foreskin have enlarged, kerotinized heads, completely devoid of the sensitivity it used to have. Years of being exposed to air and rubbing against clothes dries it out and kills the nerves. The head enlarges because it's been scarred! That larger head on cut guys is scar tissue--nasty, carved out, mutilated, kerotinized leftovers of their manhood.
The idea that the uncut penis masturbates within itself is totally bogus--if a man's penis is 6 inches long and he inserts into his partner, she is receiving 6 inches whether it's covered in foreskin or not. She is receiving that length of pleasure whether the man is gliding in and out of his foreskin or not. The whole notion of "KY JELLY" is something invented in the US, for mutilated men, so they can have sex with their partners, as their dried out penises are incapable of producing their own lube. Sex with an intact man is 100 times better, no ifs ands or buts.
The cleanliness factor is the most abused, overused and stupid reasons for supporting genital mutilation that I have EVER heard. Using that logic, you should CUT OFF YOUR HANDS because they are dirty, or maybe just lop off the entire penis since it's dirty too. Yes, CASTRATE and MUTILATE all dirty body parts, because you know those men, they aren't smart enough to take a shower. You should know who originally fed this load to the American public (80% of the world's men are INTACT!), and consider who the brainwashed harpies are who buy it. It's bogus.
2006-09-07 11:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by surfinthedesert 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All women prefer circumcised they love anything with 10% off!
2006-09-06 19:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by Simon B 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i had both types of men. it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever. and about cancer of women - men should wash their private place more often, in that case their women won't have cancer.
2006-09-07 02:04:29 · answer #6 · answered by jacky 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've never been with a circumsized guy but I hear its more hygenic. Just as long as your well washed i don't think it really matters either way.
2006-09-06 19:10:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Makes absolutely no difference what-so-ever and have never found that any of my friends gave it an ounce of thought either.
2006-09-06 18:49:30 · answer #8 · answered by weatherwax1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My husband is not circumcised and it does not bother me.
2006-09-06 18:59:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the only thing with uncercomsized men are the cleanslyness in the under skin most cary bacteria an most dont wash it well enough im circumsized but my sisters ex / wasnt and she had som issues happen
2006-09-06 18:57:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋