English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-06 11:10:27 · 26 answers · asked by badpoogaly 1 in Politics & Government Military

It seems to me they are one of the biggest threats to middle east stability

2006-09-06 11:17:52 · update #1

26 answers

Yes. It's a shame that Israel didn't have their military ducks in a row before going after Hezbollah. If they had gotten rid of them, maybe they would have taken on Iran and done the rest of the world a HUGE favor.

2006-09-06 11:26:39 · answer #1 · answered by janice 6 · 1 1

Yes, it should be destroyed. The last thing any one needs is more bombs or weapons. If every one took the time to work together instead of killing each other and destroying the land this would be a wonderful world.

2006-09-06 18:33:52 · answer #2 · answered by ELIZABETH 2 · 0 1

That might be a huge challenge. We are in a weak position on Iran due to the difficulty in keeping the peace in Iraq. We should keep the pressure on until it hurts and hope for a solution that does not call for military action. Of course if that does not work, we have the ability to take it out.

2006-09-06 18:17:22 · answer #3 · answered by united9198 7 · 1 1

Yes, but you are opening a huge can of high explosive worms. Do we need more suicide bombers in the UK. The Muslim communitee will get more upset and say we are picking on them.
Do we really need more conflict in the world. If we do I don't want the British to be anything to do with it. We have followed Uncle George Bush to far and I don't want to keep up with him anymore. Perhaps Russia, China, france will help out and get their hands dirty on this one.

2006-09-07 05:51:05 · answer #4 · answered by jimmy two times 2 · 1 1

Yes! North Korea should have been dealt with the same way! But you would have needed a President that was concentrating on the future, not HIS future!

2006-09-06 19:11:37 · answer #5 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0 0

YES - but who has the guts to do it?
There is not one Country in the World that even has the guts to disarm Hezbullah - a child of Iran. There is not one country in the World that will face up to Syria - an ally of Iran.

2006-09-06 18:15:56 · answer #6 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 0 1

If it isn't, you can bet they'll use it on us or the Israelis or both at their first opportunity. You have to remember that these people are barbarians and want to take over the world. In order to that, they know that they must get the West out of the way. Don't say I didn't warn you ahead of time.

2006-09-06 18:16:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I disagree: We need to disarm that lunatic trigger-happy Olmert as a first step toward making the region a nuclear free zone. And then iran will have no reason to create wmd's.

2006-09-06 21:28:59 · answer #8 · answered by worriedaboutyou 4 · 1 1

I certainly believe that it should be destroyed. Then we can watch to see what moves Russia and China plan on making over this.. You see, those are the real villians in this whole scenario, yet I see no advantage to waiting for someone to blink.

2006-09-06 18:47:20 · answer #9 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 1 1

America has nuclear weapons. That makes me more nervous than the possibility that Iran might one day have some...
Who knows that they won't use one -or ten- when its convenient? After all, america has used nukes on civilian populations before... Iran hasn't.

2006-09-06 18:24:30 · answer #10 · answered by AbdulShaza 1 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers