should we launch nukes into iran?

Answer 1

YUP! Lets just take care of business!

Answer 2

Get a grip buddy. You seem to fell that nukes are the answer. Is this the same Iran the U.S. government supported back until the people ran the Shah out back in the 70's. Or the Saddam the U.S. backed until they invaded Kuwait? Times and friends change. Japan, Russia and Germany are all U.S. allies. Would anyone have believed that 60 or 70 years ago? Your greatest ally now in the country you fought with for your independence, England. The U.S. has the capability to erase Iran from the map if Iran develops and uses nuclear weapons. Until then, nuking them would make the U.S. worse then the "enemy" you propose nuking. Take a valium and settle down. Today's enemy is tomorrows ally.

Answer 3

The Pres of Iran is one crazy S.O.B. and I think its pretty clear that something needs to be done right now before he has the capabilities or the rescorces to launch a nuklear attack himself. However If we just nuked Iran we would not be any better than the extremist who control their government. Im sure their are good people in Iran but a bomb cant tell the difference civillian/millitary Inocent/guilty adult/child all will die, Which isnt to say we need another full scale ground invasion, Lord knows the one in Iraq has cost us enough already. We just need to make it clear to these people some how that we will not tollerate this ****. Maybe by assasinating their pres?

Answer 4

Should we commit global suicide? I'm presuming you're talking about tactical nukes taking out the hardened nuclear facility at Natanz? Any strategic nukes will takeout approx. 200 million people with another 190 million from radioactive fallout in nearby countries whose sole guilt would be living near the Middle East.

While it would be nice to solve the problem in one blow and while it's imperative that we stop Iran's nuclear ambitions, the consequences of your actions would be monumental.

Whatever course is taken, be ready for the UNIMAGINABLE.

Answer 5

Yes, because:

1. I think we should attack another country on speculation. Iraq wasn't enough.
2. I would like for us to kill more innocent civilians without cause. The 100,000+ dead civilians in Iraq doesn't satisfy my appetite.
3. I want to pay $5/gallon for gas once Iran stops producing oil.
4. I want to pay $10/gallon for gas once Iraq renders the Strait of Hormuz unpassable thereby cutting of Saudi and most Gulf coast oil supplies.
5. Why have nukes if you can't use them?

Answer 6

we shouldn't done that a long time ago but do not launch nukes into Canada because they have enough Uranium to blast the States ten times over

Answer 7

probably be nervous yet do no longer something. shop in ideas the U. S. knew the Soviet Union had bombs and did no longer something. also, this discovery can make Iran more desirable of a actual risk, they could retaliate if attacked. And it may practice Iran had nukes for your time and performance been sane sufficient to no longer use them. If Israel took this be wakeful leaking out as be wakeful that Iran grew to develop into now close to to strike, it may probably launch a preemptive strike. the U. S. might want to wish more desirable sanctions. various something of the might want to might want to assert Iran might want to wish to disarm, yet so might want to wish to the diverse nuclear powers, alongside with Israel.

Answer 8

If we want to have nukes launched at us sure why not?

Answer 9

NO... I hope no nation ever stoops to that level again. That is one piece of American history that embarrasses me and although not alive at the time, I hate knowing that we stooped to that level.

There is no place in this world for nuclear weapons. This has to be one of the most horrific inventions ever.

Answer 10

First let's see if diplomacy works.If it doesn't,than we will probably use force,but I don't think we will use nukes.