Don't believe it. The decision to call homosexuality genetic is just an attempt by men to relieve ourselves of guilt in regard to a lack of submission to God's will. If I say it is a choice, then I sin when I choose to engage in homosexual activity. So I'll just simply call it genetic and then I have no responsibility to mold myself to the will of God. For the sake of argument, though, let's say that it is genetic. That still does not remove ones responsibility to mold his will to that of God. Scripture never says being attracted to the same sex is wrong. It is acting upon this attraction that is an abomination to God. But you may say how can I live my life without a sexual relationship? Just ask the apostle Paul. He did it following his conversion on the road to Damascus. The same question can be asked of any compulsive sin. How can I not gamble? How can I not take another drink? You see? These sins are also highly addictive in nature. So it's not suprising that they are now being called "diseases". If it is a choice I have made then I am sinning against God. If I just call it a disease, then I am freed of responsibility to deny myself and submit to God. It's a disease not sin! So I'm Ok with God. So either call a sin and sin, or just look at any struggle you are having with your submission to the will of God and call it genetic or a disease. Pretty inventive way of not having to deal with it, huh?
2006-09-06 09:17:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by yagman 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Homosexuality is NOT genetic because nothing comes out of it. Biologically speaking, men are supposed to want to have sex with women and women are supposed to want to have sex with men for the advancement of our species. I know most of you aren't going to listen to this arguement and are probably of the opinion that the world's overpopulated enough as it it, but that's the FACT. Frankly, I think that if homosexuals would just admit to themselves that what they are doing is a choice, then straights would probably accept them more. If you go around and say that what you do is genetic, then they're going to think you're either terribly confused or just an idiot.
But IF homosexuality is genetic, then gays and lesbians will just have to accept the fact that they were born genetically defficient, like someone who was born with no arms; it's a simple accident of nature, and no possible good for the human race can ever come out of it. It's unfortunate, and just something you have to put up with.
And no, I'm NOT a gay-hating nazi, alright? I just hate how people are fighting so hard for something that just isn't supposed to happen.
2006-09-06 09:10:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
i don't sense your chum is observing for a piece of writing that asserts being a gay is genetic or a call. i think he already knows of like maximum individuals homosexuals that its now no longer a option. Now that doesn't mean that there at the prompt are not some human beings interior the marketplace who chosen to be gay even if on your chum's case and an excellent variety of alternative homosexuals, it should be no longer a option. What your chum is observing for is attractiveness from God. He desires to entice close that God even if loves him and he's now no longer through myself. Please tell him God loves all of his little ones no remember what individuals say, no remember what laws are created. no man or woman is spectacular. i do no longer understand what self-discipline you're from yet the following is an information superhighway web site. prepare it to him. MCC is a Metropolitan community Church that welcomes homosexuals and preaches love now no longer hate. Please tell him that the commonest courting he has is the relationship between him and God and it should be a man or woman courting that no one yet him and God is also an element of. that's plausible to be non secular and gay.
2016-10-15 23:17:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by venturino 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay, I have to jump in here. I don't think that it's necessarily genetic. You can't "pass" homosexuality on to your children. But, with that said, scientists have done brain scans on homosexual men and heterosexual men. The brain of the homosexual man is remarkably different from the brain of the heterosexual man. Therefore, there is something developmentally different there.
Now, in the case of females, there is no difference in the homosexual brain and the heterosexual brain. Studies have shown that in most homosexual females, something traumatic has happened to them at a young age, typically involving a man. Their attraction to women is their brain's coping mechanism.
No, homosexuality is NOT a choice. If you are completely heterosexual, could you force yourself to become homosexual? I think not. Homosexuals aren't attracted to the members of the same sex just to piss people off who think it's wrong.
I am happily married to a wonderful man, but to all of you out there who bash homosexuals, you need to get off your podium and pay more attention to your own lives.
2006-09-06 09:20:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, boiling a person's actions down to genetic or choice isn't that easy.
True, they have never found the gay "gene", but finding a gene (or combination of genes that work together) can be a lifetime of work.
And just because someone has a prediliction toward a behavior, dosen't mean they have to follow it. Like kids of alcoholics that don't drink.
Most scientists stick to the idea that most behavior is one third taught (socialization) and two thirds genetic.
2006-09-06 09:14:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by adphllps 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Difficult to say, gene responsible has not been found. Given the fact the if true homosexuals are programmed not to reproduce, could reflect a natural selection process removing an instance of the species from the gene pool, but I digress, how would the gene be passed along?
2006-09-06 09:06:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dane 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
First off, check out www.narth.com
This is a non-religious website showing that scientific evidence shows that homosexuality is not genetic.
Second, why doesn't anyone want to be responsible for choosing to be homosexual? Could it be because deep down they know that it's wrong? Hmmm.
2006-09-10 03:43:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by scott_faith 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Not your fault at all. Give in to any strange impulse you may have.
Think about this: If homosexuality was genetic, how would there be a human race?
Must be a deviant gene that needs to be destroyed.
2006-09-06 09:04:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jay Z 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
studies show that homosexuality is not genetic but rather has to do with hormones a fetus is exposed to while in the womb. it is not genetic because for instance there can be two identical twins where one is gay and one is straight. if it were entirely genetic then they would both be homosexual or heterosexual. however, the studies are still inconclusive when it comes to why one of the twins are exposed to certain hormones and the other isnt.
an example of the study was tested on lab rats injected with one shot of hormone at birth. when a rat is born it is similar to a human fetus in its third trimester. the female rat was injected with testosterone once. rats normally present themselves to the opposite sex by lifting their head and bottom to the other rat (it is automatic). they found that the female rat with testosterone did not present to a male rat - ever. in addition to that they castrated a male rat at birth, and thus depriving it of testosterone. later in life they found that the male rat would present himself to other male rats in the same manner that a female would.
the studies are still ongoing and there are still a lot of things that cannot be explained at this time. i thought it was rather fascinating though.
2006-09-06 09:08:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by NAQ 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are many people who have a genetic weakness for alcohol that have never taken a drink in their lives. I don't care if it's genetic or not I am talking about behavior.... Jim
2006-09-06 09:08:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋