Well, there is one overwhelmingly compelling reason to conclude that he was NOT gay... that being that he did not exist. Modern biblical scholarship makes a very compelling case for the idea that Jesus was, in fact, entirely fictional.
The Jesus Puzzle
http://pages.ca.inter.net/%7Eoblio/jhcjp.htm
http://jesuspuzzle.humanists.net/home.htm
2006-09-05 13:02:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Thats the best thing about christianity. There is no evidence that this man ever lived.
There is, however, evidence that he was created from the works of many different pagan scholars who roamed the countries, teaching a some similare teachings to jesus.
2006-09-05 13:09:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Jesus Christ was the one who wrote the laws of god because he was god:
1 John 5:7 (King James Version)
7For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
John 1:1-5 (King James Version)
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2The same was in the beginning with God.
3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
So try explaining your evidence.
2006-09-05 12:57:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Wow...the assertion you made in your clarification requires evidence. Simply saying that something is true does NOT prove nor imply that the opposite is the truth.
2006-09-05 13:01:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by stronzo5785 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is absolutely no evidence that He was.
Yes, there is no mention of Jesus being married, and almost every Jewish male was married.
However, not being married (and for all we know he WAS married) does not mean someone is gay, just like someone being married does NOT mean that they aren't!
Anyway, it appears you are trying to stir up...stuff...
Have fun.
2006-09-05 13:05:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Colin 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
What emphirical evidence is there that clearly suggest that CJunk is not
2006-09-05 12:59:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
What empirirical evidence there is, is that you are bleeding your parent's bank account, and being a burden to your father, who WISHES & prays he shot his load down the toilet, instead of creating a spoiled, worthless brat.
2006-09-05 13:02:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by bereftcat 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is no empirical evidence that he was straight either. So not being able to prove that he wasn't straight, proves that he was.
Silly argumentation.
2006-09-05 13:02:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by FaerieWhings 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Jesus was not gay dude.
2006-09-05 13:01:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why would he preach against it if he was gay? Jesus was not gay.
2006-09-05 17:43:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by GraycieLee 6
·
0⤊
1⤋