To supply tissue for future repairs? Wouldn't that resolve the "ethical problems"?
2006-09-05 12:38:01 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Apparently , Myrna (who I assume is a GIRL, ironically) is the only person who understood the question, LOL!
2006-09-05 12:45:28 · update #1
Well, there's the answer to "What should I do with this foreskin, doctor?"
Now what do we do with the girls?? Hmmm.
2006-09-05 12:41:36 · answer #1 · answered by Myrna B 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋
To the first poster>> what is has to do with religion is the fact that your President has outlawed stem cell research BASED UPON HIS RELIGIOUS BELEIFS, and then gives the old "ethical dilemma" excuse......
If you want to resolve the ethical dilemma, simply pray that all of God's beleivers shall be affected by cancers and hodgkins disease and Parkinsons. THat way, when it comes time to vote in the future, those in power might actually have a reason to vote YES.
2006-09-05 19:48:02 · answer #2 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are looking for an easily attainable source of stem cells, then it is unnecessary to mangle or amputate any part of any newborn child. The umbilical cord and placenta are chock full of stem cells, yet are routinely thrown away in the garbage. Why are we talking about "harvesting" human beings for stem cell research, when there is an endless supply going in the trash can all the time?
If you are NOT talking about stem cells, I have no idea how to answer your question, other than "NO!"
2006-09-05 19:44:11 · answer #3 · answered by MamaBear 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you have problems dont you!!! why dont we chop off a small peice of you and then resolve the ethical problems!!! your weird and you must have put a lot of thought into that question!!!
2006-09-05 19:42:34 · answer #4 · answered by Vanah 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What? You are in the wrong thread, actually I dont think there is a thread for this idiotic question. Hmm, maybe reporting would be the thing to do.
2006-09-05 19:41:25 · answer #5 · answered by blaze 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
when I was 7 days old they chopped my foreskin off. I don't think it was saved for anything. It was a religious thing
2006-09-05 19:47:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, I believe that you can get these cells from their umbilical cord. No infant chopping necessary.
2006-09-05 19:43:51 · answer #7 · answered by abfabmom1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NEVER,, not for circumcison or anything...
TAKE home the WHOLE baby
you can have cord blood saved for a price for that very reason
2006-09-05 19:44:12 · answer #8 · answered by polka_123_pa 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Chopping is much different than slicing or nicking or sluicing - chopping is scary. Start over with this question please. Ethics has NOTHING to do with CHOPPING.
2006-09-05 19:41:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if the baby gives an OK.
This was done as ""A Sign"" in the O.T.
but--that is a different story!
2006-09-05 19:40:35 · answer #10 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋