2006-09-05 09:47:27 · 27 answers · asked by sunsworth1975 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
LMAO, i dont think insects were part of the animal thing. (however if they were then he had a loooooooooooot of bugs on his ship who apparently didng get squarshed by the lots of animals. good question. i hate mosquitos.
2006-09-05 09:49:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I realize that there are religious people who believe that the story of Noah was more than just an allegory, but an actual occurance. Do any of these people have any idea of how many different animals there are in the world?
But- to answer your question- he needed to keep the mosquitos, so there'd be something for the bats to eat.
http://www.godisimaginary.com
2006-09-05 09:56:20 · answer #2 · answered by Morey000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
err could it be because he only took animals on that would drown, mossies fly, how deep was the bloody flood. of course it was impossible anyway, so many different animals from all around the world just happened to be in the right place at the right time. yeah, and the lions didn't eat the squirrels. OK
2006-09-05 09:58:25 · answer #3 · answered by flibertyjib 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because then the bats would have not had the proper food to eat. Everything has a purpose in this world. Every creature belongs.
2006-09-05 09:52:46 · answer #4 · answered by Husker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too right mate!!! Then i wouldn't ave just got back from Turkey with my left and right arm looking like something out of a horror movie!!!! I will deffo have some war scares.
2006-09-05 09:57:52 · answer #5 · answered by Sarah F 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess he was too busy with all the other creatures! Not to mention that he had been so hard at work-maybe the mosquitoes were not bothering him!!!!!!
2006-09-05 09:52:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there were no insects on the ark. God told noah to take with him every creature "in whose nostrils are the breath of life"
insects breath through their skin
2006-09-05 12:18:06 · answer #7 · answered by lordaviii 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Then you wouldn't be able to swat some.
2006-09-05 09:52:11 · answer #8 · answered by robert p 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, I suppose he didn't really want to stop long enough to accept the Nobel Peace Prize.
2006-09-05 09:49:45 · answer #9 · answered by Joe Cool 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well until after the flood animals did not feed on other animals or humans. So he didn't have any reason too.
2006-09-05 09:50:49 · answer #10 · answered by kclark747 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋