English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The United States: Most powerful military in the world. Now, The Insurgents...... ( Also known as Freedom Fighters) They are a rag tag group of men with basic weapons, little or no money but a will to fight for their beliefs. The question is this. How can that rag tag group of men with basic weapons put the hurt on the all powerful USA military? We (USA) spend Billions per month on the war and they ( Insurgents ) spend a few dollars here and there "BUT" are beating the USA military's butt day in and day out. The USA military is getting their rear ends handed to them everyday. How can this be? Do I hear an echo saying "Vietnam" is here again?

2006-09-05 06:21:50 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

20 answers

How can I answer what you have already put a spin on???
I have served two tours in Iraq and preparing for the third. I don't know what war you're talking about but its not OIF. Go back watching E.T. and CBS you fukcing dope head - YOU GOTTA BE STONED!!!!!

2006-09-05 07:56:17 · answer #1 · answered by nardo84 3 · 2 1

Your numbers are a bit inflated. But I see your point.

Consider this. The only information we receive is from OUR news organizations.

As far as are the insurgents beating our butts, I'm not sure if that's at all true.

The first two weeks of the war where justified. It should have ended when we got Saddam.

2006-09-05 06:31:15 · answer #2 · answered by Ricky Roma 2 · 1 0

Saddam became placed on top of issues with the help of the CIA. Bush Sr. had a raffle to get rid of him years in the previous this (desolate tract hurricane). particular, the middle East has, or did have WMD, yet through United u . s . a ., Saddam and his cronies have been able to disburse the weapons in the previous the US became allowed to act. remember, Bush needed to bypass in Oct of 2001, the place WMD could have been discovered. The United u . s . a . led to Bush and gang to postpone until Spring of 2002. remember, the United international locations are in touch with many of the delays and shortage of existence the U.S. suffers. The U.N. constantly warns non-democratic international locations (that are just about all international locations different than the US, England, Japan and Australia) of ALL US protection stress movements. this permits the Communistic, Socialistic and different regimes to coach for Allied presence. particular, Bush has made many errors... yet, he's a corporation guy, not a protection stress strategist. He has to place self belief in the counsel that comes from the two DEMOCRATS and REPUBLICANS. remember, the two events might look diverse, yet they are extra alike than maximum could supply them credit. the two events gave him confusing and misinformed comments. PURPOSELY. The schedule for the middle East might desire to have been 2-fold: Ben laden and Saddam. Then get out. the US shouldn't attempt to alter the political concern basically through fact it won't be able to get replaced. the middle East, reminiscent of the Israelites, have been the comparable through fact it began Centuries in the past. the middle East will constantly be a hotbed. the only reason the US continues to be interior the middle East... the Oil businesses. the US Oil Cartels will in no way enable the US out of the middle East until each and all of the oil has been drained. even though if the Democrats gained the Oval workplace, issues may be the comparable or worse. probably plenty worse. I even have in no way considered something the two party has performed interior the final 60 - 70 years that hasn't bitten us interior the (a ss) a decade or so later. remember, the cost of protection is the sacrifice of Freedoms our Forefathers fought to income. The extra we want the government and law enforcement officials to remedy our issues, the extra Freedoms taken away.

2016-11-24 22:56:29 · answer #3 · answered by southern 4 · 0 0

You will only recognize our success when you recognize our enemy. Since the days of Jimmie Carter we have fought this same enemy. Bush is the first one to really fight back. Since he has set things on our end of the war into full force the enemy, Islam, has set theirs into full force as well. Islam does not spend a few dollars here and there either. It is the worlds largest religion, hellbent on seeing you convert or die. Our only lack of victory will be due to those who refuse to recognize the scope of the battle. Thus far I have seen a bunch of politicians succumbing to the liberal power of PC and refusing to name our enemy by it's true name. They like insurgents, or terrorists, or freedom fighters, etc. One day we will call it Islam or one day we will all be Muslims or dead.

Thanks to liberals in America and the rest of the world we may never be able to call our enemy by it's true name and we will be destroyed. The stage is set, how will the play end? I say a peek into the Book of Revelation will help us see the outcome.

2006-09-05 06:31:08 · answer #4 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 3 1

That is a horrible analogy. First off, let's take a closer look at what you call "getting their butts handed to them". I am going to put you in a city environment, and surround you with 1000 people that all look the same, one of them is carrying a basket with a bomb in it. Now your job is to figure out who it is, before he walks past you and blows it up. A surprise and unforseeable attack, is not the same thing as getting your butt handed to you, and you also need ot know that some of the bomb these insurgents are using, are quite sophisticated, and that they are being financed by other enemies of the US like hizbollah and al qaeda. So they are not spending a few dollars a day, you ignorant imbecile, they are more than likely spending tens of thousands a day, probably hundreds of thousands.
Did the people in the twin towers get their butts handed to them , when a surprise and unforseeable attack, killed them? Look at the big picture you narrow minded idiot. I think we should bring our boys home as well, but I choose to support my country, If you hate the US so much move to France.

2006-09-05 06:28:11 · answer #5 · answered by Alex H 3 · 10 2

you got it all wrong man, and i don't support the war whatsoever. nobody is kicking our butt. we just got there number 2 man, and unfortunately we still have ******** cheney. yes we have brave men and women over there dying day in and day out, but no one is kicking our butt. The problem with the war, i believe, is that it is about oil, at any price, and not at all about freeing Iraq. support the troops, not the prez, thats my take. semper fi

2006-09-05 10:45:11 · answer #6 · answered by Lew 2 · 0 0

Remember Jill Carroll, the reporter that was kidnapped at the beginning of the year? She tells of her horrific ordeal detailing everything. She got to see the in's and out's of how they operate. It's a very interesting story.

2006-09-05 12:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by Goose 1 · 1 1

what the **** is the crap about kool aide?

They are on their home turf.

They use children to help fight. They will pay the family 35,000 if they sacrifice their child for their cause.

They fight dirty while we have to adhere to the Geneva Convention. (which makes some of the troops who are "guilty" of murder innocent in my eyes).


And while y'all say that we just follow along with sheep - that is exactly what some of y'all are doing. The sheep filled road goes both ways.


AND if we hadn't gone to war - and got attacked on our land again - y'all would still be calling for Bush's head. So it wouldn't matter what he did - he'd be wrong to all of you.

If Clinton was still in his presidency and had the balls to follow thru with anything you'd be supporting the whole shebang.

2006-09-05 07:57:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Sounds to me like you are doing the spinning. Count their dead. Now count ours. They cheat lie and steal, kidnap and hide behind girls and kids. We don't. If we fought like them, then we would have nuked them by now. To sum it all up, you have your head screwed on backward. It's OK to be against the war, but don't say the US's butt's getting kicked when you haven't got a clue.

2006-09-05 06:35:39 · answer #9 · answered by nitr0bike 4 · 2 1

Isn;t it still funny how liberals still cry the longest / loudest and the most, but yet, do nothing in the way of service or offering viable solutions.

2006-09-05 06:32:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers