English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just think about conditions in which most of the natural resources get eroded and most of the people are busy in creating artificial services and goods. Are such artificial economies sustainable without backing of a base of natural resources? What is the net impact of the activities of artificial economies on the real economies?

2006-09-05 01:18:55 · 3 answers · asked by orsel 2 in Social Science Economics

Artificial economies may include such activities which donot involve physical production of anything. It is often seen that those ppl who donot produce anything are in possession of most of physical goods. That means physical goods cannot bring one enough physical goods and it is just manipulation of the system which result in concentration of wealth in almost inactive hands. Artificial economies may exclude those who directly or indirectly add to the total tangible production. Not yet clear but there is something like that which which seems to be haunting the systems.

2006-09-11 01:58:50 · update #1

3 answers

i don't think such a thing exsists because then you'd be earning artificial money which can't get you anything

in case if you forgot :
Artificial refers to something which is not natural, often implying that it was created or manufactured by humans

A.K.A = NOT REAL

2006-09-05 03:23:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If natural resources are indeed eroded, they will account for a majority of goods and services produced, because they will be scarce and thus expensive. Any real economy out there is first and foremost "artificial"; ever since the Industrial Revolution, the share of natural resources in the total pool of goods and services has been declining...

2006-09-05 11:02:15 · answer #2 · answered by NC 7 · 1 0

no

2006-09-11 10:42:03 · answer #3 · answered by jazideol 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers