I am very sorry that I do not find a woman's breast to be an obscenity
Did God do something obscene in giving women breasts? Or, did he know what he was doing putting humans among the class mammalia? I worry that many of my fine Christian Brothers and Sisters believe that God sinned when he gave women breasts and that to look at a breast is to commit the unpardonable sin. Indeed, this is how the network bozos sound. How can we be so ashamed of or horrified by our own bodies? What is this Puritan insanity and revulsion/embarrassment over breasts? Honestly, women have had them since the beginning of time. There is nothing inherently evil about breasts. Nor is there any evil which befalls people when they see breasts. Up until as recently as 3 generations ago every single person on earth not only saw breasts but sucked on them, too. Yet, a visitor from another planet would conclude by the morally bankrupt Puritanism of America that it would now defile a man to see a breast.
2006-09-04 21:27:07 · 13 answers · asked by thenewfaceofevil 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
God is ingenious.
And has a sense of humor.
He knew what beauty was, so He created Woman.
He knew what a sense of humor was, So He created you.
I know I can see the humor in that.
You?
2006-09-04 21:29:09 · answer #1 · answered by beentofiveconsonants 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
God created humans exactly the way he wanted to. The only thing immoral about looking upon a womans chest is if it is not done with purity. They can be looked on as art, as something to admire, and can be used for their use - to feed babies. But it's when a man who isn't married to a woman who has her chest exposed gets turned on by seeing her, or has impure thoughts of her and her chest that moral issues arise. **** are the best thing ever, there's no denying, but it's their use and circumstances that determine appropriateness.
2006-09-04 21:33:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You don't have to be sorry. It's your opinion. Personally, I don't see what the hubb-bubb is all about either. It's like, you see them on every girl who happens to walk past, even if not the actual skin but like, that's all it is: it's just skin. But now I'm not saying go flaunt them around for the whole damn world to see cause like, we might find nothing wrong with them but according to society and other people and older generations it's not 'ethical'. But really, there is nothing wrong with breasts.
2006-09-04 21:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by Metal Paw 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Besides size, there isn't much difference between the chest of a man and a woman. There is no logic behind the assumption that one ought to be covered, and the other not.
2006-09-04 21:32:35 · answer #4 · answered by RED MIST! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's America, basically. There are plenty of other places that don't have as many hangups.
"Morally bankrupt Puritanism"...that's maybe the best phrase I've heard to describe this country.
2006-09-04 21:31:50 · answer #5 · answered by angk 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In all my own learn, I have not met a sub-subculture that ought to recommend her behaviour as being justifiable or morally suitable...i attempt to ward off making use of my own and subjective opinion, yet thus i ought to consider your perspective; her habit replaced into, and nevertheless is, inexcusable. I recommend you contact a criminal representative to debate perchance scuffling with for the boy, in case you want to have him. be certain to inform them this tale, as she should be considered undeserving as a mom, giving you a larger danger of triumphing custody in the courts.
2016-12-06 10:38:05 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Woman's breast is primarily created to feed its infants. The fact that it is also use in sexual connotation is just an icing on the cake.
2006-09-04 21:33:48 · answer #7 · answered by jlaniwan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's a counter question -- if women can't expose their chests in public, then can men? Isn't a man's chest just as sexually attractive to a woman, as a woman's chest is to a man? I say, if it's illegal for a woman to go bare chested, then it should be illegal for a man to go bare chested. Likewise, if it's legal for a man to go bare chested, then it should be legal for a woman to go bare chested.
2006-09-08 16:14:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately, the exposed ones causes men (and some women) to lust and commit adultery.
2006-09-04 21:30:48 · answer #9 · answered by KREAL1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no breast are not a bad thing....but they should be covered.....why do you think that adam and eve hid themselves from the Lord when they found out they were naked...
2006-09-04 21:30:45 · answer #10 · answered by Presiding Bishop 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋