2006-09-04 20:31:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Nah, he left her and the little bastard pretty much on their own.
2006-09-04 20:48:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No he didn't have to as she was married to Joseph at the time of the conception and birth and so Joseph was legally considered Jesus' dad and was financially responsible for him. All though we all know the truth now.
2006-09-05 03:48:03 · answer #2 · answered by aibnyc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God provide all of JC His Son's needs, doesn't have to pay anyone coz He is the top man.
2006-09-05 03:39:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Here's your sign. You're the dumbest most disrespectful cuntt on YA.
2006-09-05 03:44:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Bible talks about prophets, not profits. :-)
2006-09-05 03:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by Pastor Chad from JesusFreak.com 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why are you looking to collect???
2006-09-05 03:38:58 · answer #6 · answered by Aptoslady 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you must be verry stupid to ask something like that!
2006-09-05 03:41:38 · answer #7 · answered by angel 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ur sick but i dont think so coz it was not detailed in the bible
2006-09-05 03:35:06 · answer #8 · answered by Snifer 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i think it did.. but the romans tooks it all!
2006-09-05 03:34:40 · answer #9 · answered by megaherzfan 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think so, but he sure made her famous! lol
2006-09-05 03:39:02 · answer #10 · answered by MrZ 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋