For those who may not know, the 3-Fold Law goes something like this:
Ever mind the Rule of Three
Three times what thou givest returns to thee
This lesson well, thou must learn
Thee only gets what thou dost earn!
2006-09-04 20:28:39 · 15 answers · asked by fuguee.rm 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Is not the threefold law, in essence, karma amplified?
2006-09-04 20:33:29 · answer #1 · answered by Celestian Vega 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe in both, mainly the 3fold law because I am a practising pagan.. But I also believe in Karma and what you send out comes back to you good or bad.
2006-09-04 21:12:49 · answer #2 · answered by gypsymaiden67 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe more in karma, I guess. I don't take the 3-fold law literally.
Blessed be.
2006-09-04 20:45:52 · answer #3 · answered by Huddy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before this, I have never heard of 3-fold. I do believe strongly in karma... what goes around comes around.
2006-09-04 20:34:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly, Wicca isn't even approximately spells. the folk you're describing stay a delusion, slapping the term "Wicca" onto some thing they have not studied lots and that they think of will supply them mad majickhal skillz. finally they advance up, and maximum frequently they end calling themselves "Wiccan" altogether while they understand they could't honestly resolve all of life's problems with a candle and slightly rosemary. some Wiccans believe interior the Threefold regulation. some do not. i'm one that would not. i believe we go through the end results of our movements, yet i don't think of the universe magically will develop each and every thing threefold. yet neither of those motives keep me from using "black magic." First, i don't believe various that stuff works. you only don't get great consequences for little attempt. it is not how the universe works. 2d, magic emanates from you. in case you desire to deliver nasty stuff out first you your self could desire to be uncovered to it. 0.33, i think of this is frequently incorrect. For some reason those human beings think of its okay to break somebody with magic even although they might admit it is not ethical to, say, hit stressful guy or woman with a baseball bat. injury is injury. i might purely reason injury to somebody (notwithstanding if mundane or magic) while it grew to become into honestly warranted, lesser concepts are exhausted, and it would honestly accomplish some thing effective, extremely than only making me sense greater clever from a touch vengeance.
2016-10-01 08:08:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in the 2 point law.
Or What goes around, comes around.
2006-09-04 20:31:34 · answer #6 · answered by Henry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Karma. its all around us. what does one do who kills? gets arrested, what if he is never caught? he is forever running in painfull guilt.
Karma pays us greatly with guilt a powerfull weapon because it defines us of whom we are.
if one does good good may come. but if that good never comes. someone is remembering with great inspiration of you good deeds.
its best to say that Karma isnt controlling us but more likely giving us the result of our action. good or bad.
2006-09-04 20:34:19 · answer #7 · answered by Wisdom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like both roughly equate to the same concept. It is the reverse of the “do unto others….” concept yet means the same thing.
2006-09-04 20:32:44 · answer #8 · answered by thewolfskoll 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Karma becaus is the old one
2006-09-04 20:33:54 · answer #9 · answered by Centurion The Great 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in both. Basic principle-wise, they are pretty much the same.
2006-09-04 20:30:49 · answer #10 · answered by Purple Monkey Dishwasher 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋