I've been told "There will be more "friction". (with a circumcised) The entire length of the circumcised penis will move across your genitals whereas the uncircumcised penis will "glide" in an out under the foreskin." Is this true and which feels better?
2006-09-04 06:22:38 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
personally I only date circumcised men, its the hygine factor 4 me. besides a dick looks really freaking weird with a hood over it ....sorry 2 all those uncircumcised men out there
2006-09-04 06:25:48 · answer #1 · answered by Lady Geo 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
The only way to truely answer this question would be to grown up and had sex as an uncircumcised guy then gown to the doctor to be circumcised. Then after the opperationa and the healing process to have had sex again and then compare the difference.
I can't help you there. I was cut shortly after birth. How about you?
Have a good life.
2006-09-04 06:27:41 · answer #2 · answered by Lee 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Circumcised men can not lead a natural life, they are too sex-maniac and religions makes it compulsory to improve sociability of individuals. All muslim, jews and most of the christians are circumcised but hindus and religions based on hinduism belives being close to nature.
Hygine depends on regular bathing and cleaning . Just like eyes need moisture for long life, so is the penis.Being close to nature is taught in Yoga, which i follow.
2006-09-04 07:15:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is an indisputable FACT that the foreskin is the most nerve-rich portion of the male anatomy. Uncircumcised men enjoy sex more, and their partners enjoy sex more. One need only read surveys and research into the subject--where the partner had both experienced a cut and uncut penis. You cannot take surveys conducted in the United States, where nearly every boy is mutilated, seriously. THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED AND UNCIRCUMCISED PENIS! They are answersing with question to NO KNOWLEDGE!
Of course the penis feels more sensation when the skin is pulled back. That's what the foreskin is for! To keep the mucous membrane (head of the penis) moist, supple, and sensitive, so that sex is extremely pleasurable. Men who lack a foreskin have enlarged, kerotinized heads, completely devoid of the sensitivity it used to have. Years of being exposed to air and rubbing against clothes dries it out and kills the nerves. The head enlarges because it's been scarred! That larger head on cut guys is scar tissue--nasty, carved out, mutilated, kerotinized leftovers of their manhood.
The idea that the uncut penis masturbates within itself is totally bogus--if a man's penis is 6 inches long and he inserts into his partner, she is receiving 6 inches whether it's covered in foreskin or not. She is receiving that length of pleasure whether the man is gliding in and out of his foreskin or not. The whole notion of "KY JELLY" is something invented in the US, for mutilated men, so they can have sex with their partners, as their dried out penises are incapable of producing their own lube. Sex with an intact man is 100 times better, no ifs ands or buts.
2006-09-07 04:45:54 · answer #4 · answered by surfinthedesert 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Difference - skin no skin. But a guy who is circumcised will generally last longer because he will not be as sensitive as the other chap. Circumcision is about cleanliness and hygene rather than better sex. If it is, it is a bonus (plus the less risk of infections).
2006-09-04 06:26:12 · answer #5 · answered by Peter T 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I personally prefer "Circumcised Men", for the mere fact if the uncircumcised man doesn't keep himself clean, he can not only give a woman, infections, he can also give her cervical cancer.. which is what happened to my sister, from being married for years to an uncircumcised man.... And this happened while she was pregnant with their "oldest-daughter"..... I think, as far as, the whole sensation thing, I dont feel there's much difference!! I had my boys circumcised as babies, because I didn't want them to go through any humiliation issues, like in the boys locker room, in school, or with women... And it also says to do it , in the bible..... I had a girlfriend who married a man who wasn't and they argued for years about him getting it done.. So, he did for her.. I would imagine, she also got infections, the reason for the arguements.. So, they can get it done later in life, too......
2006-09-04 06:30:44 · answer #6 · answered by Hmg♥Brd 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
My husband is not circumcised. he is very clean! does not taste weird to me. and can last for hours if we want to. I really enjoy having sex. I think it is great. I have been with circumcised men that are smaller.so I think it just depends on the person. if the man wants to please the woman as much as himself you cant go wrong.
2006-09-04 06:32:27 · answer #7 · answered by honey 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
circumcised is better, bigger, and provides more friction.
plus, an uncircumcised guy who has real hot and heavy sex might pull his foreskin down some in the process and it is extremely painful and a total mood killer.
2006-09-04 06:26:23 · answer #8 · answered by miss advice 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
For the Muslims and Jews, it is obligatory in their religion to
circumcise the foreskin of their penises. It's hygienic and don't
easily attract sexual transmitted diseases. The difference is
obvious, because guys whose penises are uncircumcised
would attract more diseases under their moist skins.
It's not which one feel better in sex, but importantly how to
keep it hygienic from sexual diseases in general.
2006-09-04 06:39:15 · answer #9 · answered by steplow33 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nature put the foreskin there for a purpose, and cutting it away makes sex less pleasurable for both parties.
2006-09-04 11:29:06 · answer #10 · answered by Maple 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋