2006-09-04 03:42:56 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Like crap right about now because all the world seems to care about is how many dead SOLDIERS there are. Even though the casualties are higher with civilians.
Typical media though. Me me me
2006-09-04 03:54:22 · answer #1 · answered by Yoda 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would imagine they feel horrible, and I feel for them. But I guarantee that their loved one was killed because another fanatical family member, or just one of the many terrorist that are in Iraq, put them in the situation to die. Yeah, we've had a handful of our troops that have been charged with killing innocent Iraqi's, and if they are guilty, I hope they get what is coming to them. But the majority of our troop's aren't out to kill innocent people, and when it does happen, it's because these cowards the Military is after have used their own family member's as shields, or forced our Military to do thing's that have gotten civilians killed.
Yeah, I'm sure the family members feel a lot of pain when their innocent loved one is killed. Much like the pain the families of the 9/11 victims felt when their innocent loved ones were killed by the same kind of terrorist that Saddam Hussein was training in Iraq.
2006-09-04 08:58:21 · answer #2 · answered by Naples_6 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can't presume to know. The cultural differences, what we're raised to be willing to die for, are so different. If death is more esteemed than life in some cultures, then one would suppose death has an upside. And if this is the case, then attachment to loved ones and the impulse to fight to protect them would be blunted. So too does past and present strife, conflict affect our ability to attach. I know, as an American, and with American ideals, how I would feel but as I've never been anything other than this and I've not been raised in war-torn countries where my relatives also were raised in similar conditions I can't presume that the feelings would be as strong.
That said, I do believe they feel the loss of their relatives, that grief is sharp and longing is severe. But this has been mitigated somewhat by the very social/political environment that they exist in. Then, too, is the reality that they're not out of danger and so the loss is also mitigated by the desire to increase one's own odds of survival.
2006-09-04 03:55:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I have a much better idea than you do. You see, I have walked the streets in both countries.... I have spoke with those you have the most to loose. HAVE YOU?? I didn't think so. How many terrorist do you harbor?? When your house gets stormed and "innocent" people are killed... who will mourn for you??
Until you have walked in Karballa, An Nassariyah, Ab Jubal Ri, Falluguah, Al Ramadi, Basara and numerous other towns and cities.... and spoke with REAL people and had someone thank you for ending decades of torment.... STFU!!
2006-09-04 04:34:15 · answer #4 · answered by tcatmech2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the guy with out respectable training or understanding of background calling the U. S. retarded? i won't be able to say that it ability lots coming from an information superhighway troll. the U. S. spends much extra funds and attempt than the different united states interior the international on technologies and strategies to ward off collateral harm. It fights below restrictive regulations of engagement, which places American lives in possibility and provides important benefit to criminals and terrorists, with the intention to guard civilians. perhaps you will possibly desire to a minimum of make an effort to do a sprint seek some concept referred to as duty. perhaps then you definitely can understand that as quickly as a murderer hides at the back of a human safeguard, that's their duty if that individual dies.
2016-11-06 09:53:17 · answer #5 · answered by awad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe there ashamed of themselves for allowing themselves to live in chains by the dictators that they allowed to supress them They chose to live on there knees rather than dying on there feet. They chose to say nothing when there neighbors were taken away they chose to back people who kill innocents. If they had chosen otherwise they would have died for freedom they chose to live for a lie.They chose to support those who kill innocents. Now more and more innocents die at the hands of other evil people who use this oppurtunity to line ther pockets with SILVER who love power and greed and choose to have a ferrarie rather than a soul.
They made a choice and not too many of them are innocent. The only ones innocent are the children. They are with there God and there God is angry at ALL of us who choose to allow killing to go on.
2006-09-04 04:04:26 · answer #6 · answered by Rich 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they feel exactly the same as the relatives of September 11th victims. Sorry, I'm not buying your contention that some people's lives are worth more than others.
2006-09-04 04:14:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably about the same as the families of the Trade center victims.
2006-09-04 03:50:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
How do you think the relatives of the innocent
felt when their loved ones were killed during the
911 Twin Towers fiasco? That started it all,you
know.
2006-09-04 03:46:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
In Afghanistan
-You can now fly a kite without being charged and/or beaten.
-You can listen to music without being charged and/or beaten.
-Women can choose if they want to wear a burkha.
-A woman without a burkha doesn't fear death.
-Girls can go to school.
-This crazy thing called voting has happened.
-Oddly enough the government supported by the most people is in power.
-Canadian soldiers are welcomed by villagers.
2006-09-04 03:59:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋