I have no question, but who can come up with the most intelligent answer?
2006-09-03 23:32:30 · 14 answers · asked by Jabba_da_hut_07 4 in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
Come on be creative people *:) Whats philosophying in your minds right now? This is sooooo open, you could change the world with the answers you give.
2006-09-03 23:37:02 · update #1
E=MC2
2006-09-04 00:42:53 · answer #1 · answered by cooperman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in case you had asked interior the mathematics section, you have got gained extra enlightening solutions. the basic answer is that 0/0 is undefined. even nonetheless infinity is likewise "undefined", that would not inevitably mean that 0/0 is countless. it would desire to be, or it would desire to no longer be. this form of equation is often used as "indeterminate" (as is infinity/infinity). human beings have been thinking this for fairly a mutually as, and limitations help supply the respond. evaluate here equation at x=0, which evaluates to the indeterminate type "0/0": (3x)/x because of the fact x/x = a million, this might simplify to 3. So, it would desire to be tempting to declare that (3x)/x = 3, yet that's fairly not genuine at x=0 because of the fact 0/0 is undefined. even nonetheless, we are able to declare that "the cut back of (3x)/x as x strategies 0 is 0". it fairly is in actuality asserting that if (3x)/x DID exist at x=0, it would be 3. this concept is explored in first-semester calculus classes. right here is yet another occasion: (3x^2)/(5x) at x=0 we are able to divide out an x and convert this expression to "(3/5)x", which, at x=0, is 0. So for this reason, 0/0 could be 0 if it existed. one extra: (2x)/(x^2) at x=0 we are able to divide out an x from ideal and backside, ensuing interior the expression "2/x", that's countless at x=0. So, for this reason, 0/0 could be countless if it existed. those equations have been all basic examples. extra complicated examples is often evaluated utilising l'well being facility's rule (see sources under).
2016-11-06 09:38:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not the most intelligent person to answer this question because if I was intelligent I wouldn't have answered it.
2006-09-03 23:34:27 · answer #3 · answered by -x-STEPHiE-x- 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually you are the most intellegent person because I guess you are the only one who can answer the question you want to ask. I am I right? Give me five!!!
2006-09-03 23:40:04 · answer #4 · answered by lemonadebogainville 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have an iq of 136 so that makes me in the top 5% of the population.
2006-09-03 23:35:56 · answer #5 · answered by allblackskikass 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jeez, I hate cretins who try to sound clever. Exactly what is the point of this? And if you're trying to find somebody intelligent then you're in the wrong place. Americans use this site for f*ucks sake.
2006-09-03 23:41:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
u r enough intelligent to answer this question youself.
2006-09-03 23:42:25 · answer #7 · answered by basit 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
are you bored or something? cant you think of a real question? you are obviously not intelligent!
2006-09-03 23:36:25 · answer #8 · answered by megz 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what is the meaning of what ?
Hope this is enough for the day !
2006-09-03 23:35:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
probably me but then again i always answer stupid questions with stupid answers.
2006-09-04 00:39:02 · answer #10 · answered by dinkydoo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋