English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If evolution was true, then: 1) why is the oldest tree in the world only 4000 yearsold, and the biggest corral reaf also only 4000 years old? 2) The moon moves away from the earth 2cm per year, why can we still see the moon? 3) If the sun is loosing its energy, why is it still hot on sertian places on earth 4) Why have we never see a star forming, but we see them blowing up 5) why do we get dinosaur and human footprints together 6) Why have we never see 2 apes making a human? Evolution is a lie!!!

2006-09-03 22:13:32 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

easy.

1. its actually a bit older than 4000 years old but no matter. this is, i concede, a bit puzzling to me. i read an article about a tree about 2 times odler but i havent been able to find anything about it...it seems to have dissapeared. i do agree that this does seem like real evidence for your side...but its most likely a coincidence.

im sure that trees usually dont live as old as 4000 years. my question is wether the tree is still alive. if its not then it not the oldest..more like the oldest still standing.

2. im not an astronomer so i couldnt tell you, i do know that the farther a body moves out the less grip gravity as on it...im sure as time goes on the moon will move farther per year.

im going to assume that the moon was in an orbit close enough to be stationary. as tiem goes on it moved farther and farther out to the point where it is now. just an assumption of course.

3. uh....the sun is losing power but itll be hot for a LOOONG time. billions of years from what i understand. i beleive its like 45 billion years.

4. well we do see stars forming. check out the stellar nursery.

5. well weve got ape and man footprints together as well. i guess that proves evolution....no just kidding. i fail to see the point of this, from what i udnerstand the dino footprints were there already, the huiman must have walked by (noticing them im sure) and walked along them

if i recall correctly they were found in lava or something like that. them being together proves nothing. if it does then my claim that human and ape footprints together (which im sure there are) is eviedene of evolution.

6. because apes produce apes. man, a different species, produce man. we have a common ancestpr we dont come directly from apes.

it seems to me that youre most likely a kid, regurgitating stuff youve got from other people and websites. kent Hovind im sure...

i reccomend you get educated, not saying youre dumb...but educated on the subject.

2006-09-03 22:14:41 · answer #1 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 2 0

1. Sorry, I don't understand. Do you want us to believe that the first tree & coral reef your creator made are still there & they are only 4000 years old?
2. If a train moves away from you 2cm per year, how long will it take to disappear from your sight? Think that the moon is so big and we can see it from earth. So how long do you think it takes to disappear from your sight?
3. Do you think sun is just a candle? Please learn the basic science principles and try to argue logically.
4. You heard only the half of the story. If it can blow up itself, why cannot it form itslef?
5. I am not sure about this story. But I doubt this discovery is from a scientist like you. Have they proved that both the prints are equally aged?
6. There are hundred thousands of evidences of genetic disorders. Haven't you heard about six legs calves? two head turtles? Please understand the meaning of evolution. If it happens in one day, they will not call it evolution.

So do you still think evolution is a lie? Think you better study these things logically before jump into conclusions.

2006-09-03 22:58:44 · answer #2 · answered by Thusantha H 2 · 0 0

"...to try to explain away God at any price so that they can continue to sin without feeling guilt."

Sin is a man made concept to control the masses. Why would anyone believe in a being that puts limits on what is simply human nature? Why would anyone believe in a god who puts conditions on his love. I won't put my faith on a god who is so vain that you must worship him in order to make it to heaven. No matter that you are a good, caring person. If you don't claim your love for god then you're going to hell. Talk about friggin' ego.

Your list is just stupid. Let me break it down a bit for you.
1)The oldest tree is 4000 years old. Okay. The oldest LIVING tree. Do you assume there were no trees before then? I mean trees do die. And there are tree FOSSILS that are older than 4000 years. The same can be said about corral reefs.

2)The moon moves away from the eart 2cm/year so in 50 years it would move about only 1 meter. So, in 50,000 years that is only one KM away. How many KM is it now and yet we can still see it. Plus, we don't know if that rate is constant. So, a million years ago it may have moved at a different rate.

3)It takes billions of years for the sun to die out. So the amount of energy it uses is neglible in our concept of time.

4)Science does see stars forming. It is like a flower growing. You don't actually see the flower growing. You just see the stages it is going through and one day there is a flower. This also goes back to the sun dying. It is a slow process that works in stages.

5)I'm not aware that dinosaur and human footprints were found together.

6)This is not how evolution works. It doesn't happen that fast. Evolution is about adapting to an enviroment. We did not descend from apes and they didn't descend from us. We descended from the same ancestor. We're not even related to Neanderthals. Just think if they hadn't died out. There would actually be two seperate species of humans.

It looks to me like you've been spoonfed a bunch of crap. And like most mindless sheep you swallowed it as fact. This is just sad and says little for your intelligence. Why don't you read some books and educate yourself rather than spewing this drivel.

2006-09-03 22:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by Amelia 5 · 2 0

Clearly you are stupid. If you read/saw anything anywhere stating human and dinosaur footprints together, the source is clearly misinformed, like you.

Check the spelling of "sertian" genius.

A better question for the sheep out there is "Do you really, honestly think the Earth is only 6000 years old? You're so close minded! I guess that''s why religion typically goes after the stupid followers, and not people with the ability to reason and think.

2006-09-03 22:24:03 · answer #4 · answered by Pedro I. Wong 3 · 4 0

Professor Adjineri is misguided back. (he's amazingly a guy!) you do no longer might desire to have a scientific clarification for some thing earlier you should use it. If it works, you should use it. The birds did no longer have an theory of flight, yet they flew. women individuals did no longer understand what made cleansing soap do what it does (many nevertheless do no longer), yet they have been given their clothing sparkling besides. that's the version between a discovery and an invention. Darwin stumbled on what the animals and flora have been doing by using time. He did no longer invent the phenomenon, he purely defined it in a fashion that made extra experience than people who wrote earlier, which contain Lamarck.

2016-11-06 09:36:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

trees dont live for millions of years, corrals die out and new corral emerge, the moon is a big object therefore we can still see it, the sun is burning energy and so its using more heat to burn. star forming are rare and if u saw it then in space it would've happened 30 thousand years ago due to light traveling. bones are found in same spot different time era. 2 apes will make apes. 2 humans will make humans. they resemble us but we are different. read a little bit more before u get mad. ur probably one of those religious ppl, figures. -_-..

2006-09-03 22:22:06 · answer #6 · answered by supraman126 4 · 2 0

And you're surprised they want to teach evolution in school?? If that was done there wouldn't be millions of people like you who have been completely misinformed about the evolution by priests or fellow creationists who gain support by maintaining your ignorance. Learn about the evolution FROM A RELIABLE SOURCE before you try to prove it wrong or call it a lie. Your question shows how ignorant you are on the subject.

2006-09-03 22:27:13 · answer #7 · answered by undir 7 · 2 0

Do you people actually believe this religious stuff.

You don't actually believe Adam and Eve pranced round the garden of Eden with a couple of fig leaves (and dinosaurs too, by the sounds of things...)

I thought that the US was supposed to be a super power.

Not a country filled with superstitious, uneducated, intolerant, religious nutters.

Sorry, no offense, I am sure there are normal Americans out there somewhere, but the more I read yahoo answers, the more I am glad I live elsewhere.

2006-09-03 22:22:40 · answer #8 · answered by HP 5 · 6 0

Why not try reading about the subject from the ones who actually study it? Would you go to a Dentist to learn about Jesus? Why do you go to a preacher to learn about Science?

By asking silly questions like you got here you are doing more harm than good for your cause. Do you honestly think that scientists don't have answers to these questions? Well the ones that aren't outright lies like #4 and #5. The rest just show that you are completely ignorant of modern science and people outside your cult just laugh at you.

If you care about the truth at all...

http://www.talkorigins.org

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/

2006-09-03 22:23:01 · answer #9 · answered by AiW 5 · 3 0

haha i like it ive never been a complete believer in the evolutionary theory myself, and to adhere to todays society im gona have to add.. that does not mean i am some religious nut in fact im actually not really religious at all... i believe maybe just maybe there is something within us/ot there... anyway yeah the evolutionary theory is just that a THEORY which might have SOME truth to it...
The problem with the evolution theory is that u can practically justify anything to say that it is true so if someone says why did this evolve like this or that... then someone retrospectively puts together theories of why it supposedly happened this way or that and its hard to refute the theory even if there is little evidence to support it.. hard to explain what i mean..
what annojes me though is people that think just bcz i dont agree with the evolution theory it automatically means im religious thats far from the case... all im saying is maybe just maybe there are other theories, possibilities out there which we may not have looked at yet... so athetics would be just as narrow minded as religious people for not considering that there may actually be a 3rd theory out there...

2006-09-03 22:18:49 · answer #10 · answered by lazydazy 4 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers