No, besides, a few thousand or hundred thousand years ago the moon more than covered the sun during eclipses, and eventually, it won't cover the sun completely, that's because the moon is slowly drifting away from the earth, and, if it isn't destroyed by other means, it will eventually leave the earth all together and forever get lost from our reach. I believe the moon moves about 2 centimeters farther from the earth every year.
2006-09-03 19:18:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by BT 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
The moon only covers the sun "perfectly" if you happen to be at the right place at that right time on the surface of the Earth. Seeing as how solar eclipses don't provide humans or life any benefit at all (besides panic attacks to those who don't know enough astronomy to understand what's going on) I can't see how they prove anything about God. Other planets with moons have solar eclipses too. I guess they prove that your logic doesn't make sense.
Mars
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4442417/
Jupiter
http://www.dustbunny.com/afk/skywonders/solareclipse/
2006-09-03 19:41:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by One & only bob 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I only desire to be responsive to if the atheist can honestly grant the suited answer as they're so specific that God did not create life? - i'm able to teach that the biblical version is a delusion. All of genesis grew to become into plagiarized from the Sumerian pills having not something to do with deities so "god starting to be life" is a delusion. - As to proving the place life got here from, we settle for a organic technique on account that that has data. A deity magically forming life is a delusion on account which you have yet to show a deity exists and that what youi use as a data is a nicely shown delusion. - There you have rather data and data and no hypothesis.
2016-10-01 07:07:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by lograsso 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The moon only "covers" a small portion of the planet during a total solar eclipse. ...doesn't prove he doesn't exists.
2006-09-03 19:16:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by jeff b 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well if this planet didn't have life we wouldn't be able to observe the eclipse, so that part isn't even a coincidence. And the moon had to be of some size and some distance from the earth. You certainly haven't convinced me.
2006-09-03 19:19:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. At this moment of Earth time this true, but did you know that the Moon is moving out of the orbit. In some millions of years a perfect eclipse will be history. Anyway by that time humans will be extincted.
2006-09-03 19:28:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
As noted elsewhere, the moon is slowly being dragged away from
Earth by the Sun's gravity. Long ago, the moon was very close to
the Earth.
So to answer your question, nothing external will prove the
existence of God. You'll have to turn within.
2006-09-03 19:25:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by avocaronico 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I guess some of us still haven't learned to be more humble from our past mistake yet.
How arrogant of us to make such an Earth centered claim when we have not even the experience to physically reach the rest of the planets within the solar system, let alone outside of it?
2006-09-03 19:38:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by : ) 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Bible does not try to explain, astronomical phenomena, zoological facts etc, The Bible at it's core is about what no other Book is about. It's about one's soul. Examine yourself to see first if you believe you posses one, then in case you do, I suggest you proceed with your inquiry to an expert on the field. If on the other hand you just want to debate the science/religion thing, then continue. I also enjoy the debate but only when it is done between people that know both subjects well.
2006-09-03 19:29:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Said moon always has one side facing earth with the opposite side having a hugh image of a man/ape carved into its surface. Is the moon then a posted keepout sign for other travelers?
2006-09-03 19:27:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Marcus R. 6
·
0⤊
1⤋