English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

trained five million man army, airforce and navy? Am I missing something? At least in Vietnam we fought against a large organized military(4th largest in the world at one time). In Iraq we are pitting tanks, jets, artillery and a well trained mechanized military force against a motley crew of insurgents who only have small arms and IEDs. This is not Nazi Germany revisited. To make this claim shows how desperate the president has become to justify this misadventure.

2006-09-03 18:42:32 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

18 answers

Give me the link!!

He starts the war, and he compares THEM to Hitler! Is this man the dumbest person in the World!!

Hitler and Clinton are the 2 favorite whipping boys of the Republicans, oh, and all Liberals are Communist! Hitler has been dead for 61 years!! Why couldn't he just listened to his father 5 years ago?? He told him there was no exit strategy and we would be an occupation Army for years!

2006-09-03 19:22:15 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

First off they are not insurgents. Most are terrorists. Insurgents is just a term the media came up with. The president knows that it is just not a battle against Iraqi so called "Insurgents". They are supported by Iran, Syria, and any anti-American terrorist group supported by countries sponsoring terrorists. They are not only anti-American but also anti-Jewish. Their hate for us is very deep. What they don't want is for people to decide what kind of goverment they want They don't want the right to vote. Each party has their own agenda. Some want a Muslim Caliph system implemented, some want a Muslim dictatorship and others want a Muslim monarchy. The problem is that there are many warring factions that have a common agenda that wants us out. If we leave they will then fight each other. They don't care about Iraq. If they did they wouldn't attack Iraqis. All they care about is pushing their own agendas. They are worse then Nazis in that most are pushing bloodshed based on religion. The long bloody history of Islam would not have it any other way. If we leave now what Bin Ladin said about us being a paper tiger would be true. Small arms? I don't think so. Iran has supplied them with many arms suplied by Russia and China. China got a lot of their technology in weapons from Clinton. Now Bush is left to clean up the mess. If Clinton had the guts to stand up to these nuts we wouldn't be in this mess. If he hadn't sold military technology to the Chinese to get reelected we wouldn't have the Iran problem either. Why don't you say anything about the terrorists that kill innoccent people instead of criticizing the president who protects you from nuts attacking you?

2006-09-03 19:14:28 · answer #2 · answered by jesus_lover1962 3 · 0 0

Yes, it is not nazi it is iraq but comparison about armies are still the same, do we waste many time in dealing them? Like what nazi did to many people but still there are lots of way for progress, what's wrong with five million army? I mean if i'm in the war, it only needs the theorist idea of the beauty of war, we learned, we study, we accept failures, we cried, we saw what the future is and by that what's wrong with them?

We can have a much wiser idea than hitting below the belt against the Government, did you know what nazi are? They hate educators, they hate freedom, they hate beautiful people and they only want is to rule the world.

I'm not just a researcher but also i want to know more about the war. Indeed, war open the minds of many people, war gave courage to the weak and war gave philisophical works and issues that needs to dig more.

2006-09-03 19:13:56 · answer #3 · answered by jzbond007 1 · 0 0

that must be a joke surely
the Administration is continuing Hitlers quest word for word ,the idea of the New World Order was first heard there .
and the same people that financed everything then ,both the German,USA and English side .are behind the present administration .and all the ones preceeding it.

34 presidents are related to the same family of Charlemagne and Charles the Great.all are relations genetically linked ´(royal blood)

the blood line including many world leaders world wide ,a huge ruling clan .run by just a few people .Bush belongs to them and the Illuminati as Hitler did .

2006-09-03 18:51:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow. What college district is that? Presidnet George W. Bush prosecuted the conflict in Iraq for a number of causes. the single maximum widley comprehend and least understood, ad to do with guns of Mass Destruction. maximum human beings imagine that the conception replaced into to pass inot Iraq and locate vats of weaponized botulism or very nearly complete nuclear units. the reality is a lot less concrete--Iraq had made consistent efforts to stymie inspections and had not in any respect provided an complete accounitng of their WMD resources. there have been such resources that were prevalent to be in Iraq in 1992 and in 1998, via 2002, the question replaced into what had handed off to those materails--what were destroyed and how, the position were they, ought to any of that is shown? Hussein had also given a lot help and help to terrorists. We were engaged in Afghanistan for basically about a year and it replaced into prevalent that al Qaeda contributors were fleeing--between the chance-free havens they were fleeing to replaced into Iraq--partly the invasionwa about denying those havens and preventing help to different terror communities as well suhc as Hamas and Hezbollah.

2016-12-06 08:39:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush also has stated that he wants Iraq to become like a post world war 2 Germany, or Japan. This could be a very long process.

2006-09-03 18:48:50 · answer #6 · answered by lvillejj 4 · 0 0

While sadaam husien was a viscious warlord, he ruled his country with an iron fist. The war in iraq is not over terrorism, the insurrgents werent there untill America came in, and wanted to run ****. The war in Iraq is over oil. Cause we have 2 Oil men in office. Simple as that. Bush is securing his future at the cost of soldiers lives. So no, its not Nazi Germany with facist dictators trying to wipe out a culture of people, its people who want America and our oil greedy leaders out of there country.

2006-09-03 18:52:31 · answer #7 · answered by stratocaster23m 2 · 0 0

Interesting comments you have received here Gorky.

Charlemagne or Karl der Grosse must be reeling in his grave. If many of our modern day leaders can trace their lineage to this great person, then surely it was diluted by the time it his our era and nothing remains.

If this is about oil, then I guess us Canucks should be grateful Bush is targetting the middle east and not Canada.....lol

Enough said!!

2006-09-04 04:41:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They do have a well trained Army. Just not one we are used to fighting and dealling with.

If you count 9/11 you could make the argument that they don't need an Air Force

2006-09-03 18:44:20 · answer #9 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 2 0

The problem is that it is all urban combat with civilians close by. The insurgents are practicing a formation called hugging (firing at us forces close to hospitals, schools or other heavily civilian populated areas)

2006-09-03 18:52:19 · answer #10 · answered by mixwithanything 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers