Caring only matters when you care about the truth. ALL pets are meant to be free. Birds are no different because they can fly.
In good homes, parrots don't content with lice, malnourishment, predators and disease. Many species are threatened natively by deforestation and inbreeding. Domestic bloodlines promise a future.
Pet parrots are monogamous animals, who are thrilled spend their lives with one person -- unlike cats, for example, who are often tolerated as they howl and scheme to escape.
You cannot "set them free" here. They aren't adapted to the cold. Setting them "free" is like leaving the family puppy in the Tundra. It isn't all sunshine for farmers, either. Quaker parrots are euthanized for enduring the cold long enough to eat crops.
Adoption is the way. It's true. People buy and sell parrots ignorantly, and they need homes. My birds eat with us, take showers, cuddle, play freely and tease, and we are a fun family. Their lives would not be improved if we were apart.
2006-09-03
17:04:51
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Em
5
in
Pets
➔ Birds
I was hoping that one of those bold people who contribute posts condemning bird owners would pop in here.
2006-09-03
18:05:04 ·
update #1
As a note to #3: Your response is insightful. Even better than breeder buying, right now, is parrot adoption. There are more homeless parrots now than ever, and adoption centers are everywhere.
2006-09-03
18:17:04 ·
update #2
Importation of parrots has been illegal in the US since the 1980s. Adopting rather than buying will eliminate the demand for breeding all together.
It's not a popular opinion, but I don't think that birds other than those who are extremely threatened should ethically be bred. Acceptable efforts would include the Red Spectacled Parrot, Golden Conures, and several Toucans and Aracari (Rhamphastids -- who will notice?), not for marketing
2006-09-03
20:25:33 ·
update #3