2006-09-03 15:14:51 · 12 answers · asked by kermitscaves 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Safety
If you rearended her, you are at fault. Doesn't matter if it was wet, you should have been driving a safe enough distance away for the conditions to be able to stop without hitting her. Sorry.
2006-09-03 15:17:35 · answer #1 · answered by Smoochy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Almost always, you're at fault if you rear end someone, BUT there have been a few cases in which the person that slammed on their brakes was found at fault and cited for careless driving.
2006-09-03 22:26:16 · answer #2 · answered by Papa John 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's a case of assured clear distance...you were at fault because apparently you were following too closely for the current road conditions.
2006-09-03 22:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by Sunidaze 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You are at fault. Unless you were hit from behind, the law is always against the person who rearended the other.
The police report (if there is one) will state "Following too close for conditions."
2006-09-03 22:20:36 · answer #4 · answered by Brian L 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
You are. The car in the back is always at fault. It's called "following too close for conditions."
2006-09-03 22:17:44 · answer #5 · answered by Chick with pets 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
it is your fault cause you always must drive a safe distance from your car to the other car
2006-09-04 01:23:42 · answer #6 · answered by trixieamorearyen 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
you hit - your fault
wet ground - extenuating circumstances
but still your fault
2006-09-03 22:20:34 · answer #7 · answered by worldstiti 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
unfortunaltly its your faul b/c u made the initial hit
2006-09-03 22:21:29 · answer #8 · answered by btamlind 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It's the ground. bad,bad ground.
Say yer sorry.
2006-09-03 22:21:30 · answer #9 · answered by realquietcool 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you are ,, it is called following too closely
2006-09-03 23:39:36 · answer #10 · answered by foothill4fun 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋