will science prove god exists???

Question

some scientists believe even time came from the BIG BANG. Evolution proves god is still in the process of creating. I believe science has already proved God exists,what say you??

StN,God does not punish,we do that ourselves through the laws of cause and effect.(karma),what you put out is what you get back.Read as a man thinketh by james allen.All people know God in their heart of heart so it is not really faith but that inner yearning to return to GOD.

skipper your heart will tell you it already understands,your head may not want to put out the effort to understand. God would make known to you any thing you need to know,seek and ye shall find knock and it will be opened to you.

ghostofasoul,Since those first feeble attempts to have a closer conscious contact with God,I no longer need "faith",I have experience.

shirley e, Me to !!!!!

Rachel l, God shines brightly in science,helping us understand and better enjoy and utilize Gods creation.

Weekend Worrior, You are a prophet,more truth than fiction.

Amber,I don't belieave there ever was a missing link.

explosive and I-o-d-tiger,those of us who have experienced Gods presence say to you that in the fullness of time you to will see the "LIGHT". LOVE whistle britches

Answer 1

if god really exists,god is me.

Answer 2

Science doesn't need to prove it. We exist do we not? The Universe exsists does it not? Also, have the scientists proven how the 'BIG BANG' came about, because that would be really enlightening, since they seem to have to prove that everything has to have a logical answer. As for evolution, thats a load of crap. Think about what it is, if evolution were true, wouldn't we all be still developing into some other odd creature? I believe God exists, and I didn't need science to figure it out.

Answer 3

Whistle,

I agree with you that God does exists, so know I am coming from that place.

I think you're mixing two separate spheres of knowledge here. Proof in science is determined by repeatability in a laboratory setting according ot the scientific method or empirical observation. Metaphysical constructs, that includes the mind, are subject to reason but are not, by their nature, the same as finding a chemical formula.

Yes, there must be an ultimate cause but while reasonable that is not a strictly scientific proposition. But let me remind you, often modern cosmology and evolutionary thought crosses from science into metaphysics so all you materialist ought not to twist what I am here saying.

Answer 4

Science, as a whole, is a study of the universe and everything that's in it. As a believer in God one will say God created the universe. Therefore, God is not a property of the universe and can't be proved by science. Also, science only deals with things which are:

1. OBSERVABLE--we can't observe God with all the technology at our disposal right now.

2. CONTROLABLE--in observation, certain things must be controlled the purpose of which is to test results in different situations. We can't tell God to appear and disapper or make miracles everytime we ask Him to.

3. REPEATABLE--observations and experiments can be repeated. This is to make measurements possible because one measurement is not enough.

In other words, Science as a tool, cannot be used to prove or disprove the existence of God.

Answer 5

God created science so its all on how you take it in. The proof we have agaisnt evolution is the 'missing links'. missing....enough said right? when christians try to prove there theroys if we have 1 small detail that scientits do not understand the BOOM there is the reason God fails to exist.
But the truth is God dosent fail to exist, And by faith we believe. Not some missing links.

Answer 6

Science may be able to prove the existence of a creator but it is unlikely. Nothing can prove the existence of a god who is created to explain things and to punish people who do not believe in him. That creature has to be accepted on faith which is what its followers tell us.

Answer 7

well if you think about it, science has been mind blowing to all those scientists and philosophers who pursue it, that they end up admitting that there logically must be a god responsible for the grandiosity of nature and the human brain. so in a way, science is further more revealing what it is that we have to be amazed at god for. its like, when i learned about Darwin and the evolution, i was thinking "man. god is so intense. evolution is such an ingenious occurrence. I'm like so overwhelmed that he actually made nature that way, so complex and creative". try reading Sophie's world. a lot of the philosophers mentioned ended up believing in god because they ended up so awestruck at their own thought and they fact they existed to think about it. like aristotle, he said that there was a formal cause to everything (it just means that there's a root cause as to why things in nature are being formed). he said that the formal cause of rain is water evaporating. he did this analysis to every natural occurance and when he faced the question of 'what is the formal cause o the universe?' he ended succumbing to logic saying that the formal cause of the universe is definitely something bigger than it, and what else is bigger than the universe than god? its pretty mind boggling if you think about it.

Answer 8

I think Scientist want concrete facts to prove everything in the universe and science has proves god exsist how can a human be so complicated but yet so perfectly made?

Answer 9

Don't have to prove anything when you are God.

Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
In Christ in Love,
TJ57

Answer 10

Since when does God need science to prove He exists?

Answer 11

Scientists have supposedly proved that some of the things talked about in the bible didn't happen because there not physically impossible. However if God was bound by our physical world then he wouldn't be a God.