Heres my theory:Sexually repressed societies are more violent. Agree?

Question

I think if Women aren't putting out for Men, then Men are going to be violent, aggressive, malcontent, and have an elevated and shortened temper.

Thus in your devoutly muslim societies, you have many young men doing all kinds of ultraviolent things, and also in the bible belt of the US, hillbillies are lynching and always having to take their guns and shoot every possible thing that moves.

Also the ultra puritans back in the 1800's had to light innocent people on fire, and so on and so forth.

So basically, what I'm saying is, when women aren't putting out, then men are going to be frustrated, and go out bashing some heads.

So 99% of the violence in the world is woman's fault.

Answer 1

That isn't your theory..
Sorry...
thats been around for a long time..
Try again...

Answer 2

Explain the USA vs. a fundamentalist Muslim nation then. Great theory but the reality is that's too sweeping a generalization. USA is pretty liberal overall but gun violence and violence against women is very high compared to other G-8 nations. In fact, there is probably more per capita crime in the USA than the UAE or even Saudi Arabia.

One of the most conservative societies on Earth...Japan..has all sorts of weirdo sexual outlets underground but also one of the most non-violent societies. Or how about a nation like Sweden thought to be sexually enlightened having a terrible crime rate (look it up esp. murder rates which'll blow your stereotypes of Swedes).

Where did you get the idea lynching still occurs in the Bible Belt and when I think Bible Belt I rarely think of hillbillies...more like they live in the Appalachians.

Given that gay men can be just as violent as straight men (you've seen the Harvey Milk documentary and gays going on the rampage in SF I'm sure), I think that theory that women not poutting out = men going nutso is way off base.

Honestly, great theory but only superficially. There is more going on than repression of women that causes violence.

Answer 3

Nono and no.
Violence, you are correct, is about repression. But the repressed tendencies are hardly women's fault. The fault is repressed homosexuality. Nothing is more violent than a frustrated fag, and the military makes cynical use of this fact.
Why, most of your great military leaders have been raging queers when they are not bedecking themselves with medals and ribbons and bits of colored string.
It's 99% the fault of the anti-gay policies that keep the sojerboys from acting out.

Answer 4

It's a really stupid and sexist way you approached the subject, I believe there is some truth to it though. When I lived in London, the newspaper had the "page 3" girl, I noticed they would show nudity on TV but not much violence. Nudity and sex were more "out in the open" and they had much less violent crimes against women.

Answer 5

Where DId you come from? Women putting out? Are women things in our life? Women are our lovers, mothers, daughters, friends, wives, etc. We need to stop thinking of women as our sexual slaves. These people we call women are people with feelings. Do you not have a lover? I mean a women that truly loves you. Sex is always better when you are in love. Your kind of thinking is 12 century, or before.

Answer 6

First of all the Puritans were in the mid-1600's not 1800's.

Answer 7

Uh, fascinating theory. It always comes back to the woman biting the apple doesn't it.

Answer 8

I agree with cbmw95! Or maybe you just don't know how to get a woman huh?

Answer 9

Get a life! Stop blaming others.

Answer 10

I agree totally!