It violates the the 1st & 2nd Laws of thermodynamics, Biogenesis and cause and effect
2006-09-03 07:57:37 · 33 answers · asked by Defender of Freedom 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
shall we placed one element immediately first. organic technology and organic faith do not contradict one yet another Evolution is a scientific concept it is not organic technology. God has Created policies and follows them. God is Logical he would not contradict himself. there is entirely one real faith. Evolution is an thought that all and sundry living creatures stepped forward from some a hardship-loose evolutionary ancestor. Evolution additionally states that this creature stepped forward from rocks and rain. the opposite steps are animals and flora - single celled organism - prehistoric cellular and mitocondria and chloroplasts - ooze that includes construction blocks of life - rocks and acid rain - lava and gases from volcanoes. that's what unpure-technology claims you stepped forward from Evolutionary concept is likewise lacking too many products to make an extensive map or photograph. like making a puzzle with purely 0.a million% to a million% of the products. would not artwork era. and because faith supplies the only different option i'm going to could desire to pass with the theory that we are created via God. regardless of each and every thing how does a quatinary organic and organic programing language (DNA) that works honestly come into existance via twist of fate. there is too lots order interior the universe for it to have only got here approximately.
2016-10-01 06:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural biological evolution fails at all levels except for those species numbering more than about one quadrillion individuals with generation times less than three months and body sizes smaller than one centimeter.
Check out:
http://www.reasons.org/
2006-09-09 20:15:26 · answer #2 · answered by mrpink 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go read up on thermodynamics again, buddy, because it most definitely does not go against the laws of thermodynamics. Besides, we can believe that evolution is God's creation.
2006-09-03 08:00:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, it does not.
It does not violate the laws of thermodynamics because it is not generating new energy or complexity. It is merely concentrating it. This same concentration of negative entropy is what allows life forms to survive rather than immediately dying. If you think evolution is impossible because of the laws of thermodynamics, you should also think life is impossible for the same reason.
Biogenesis is itself a flawed concept. It is possible for nonlife to become life through chemical processes. However, it only happens through a coincidental chemical reaction, while life forms can reproduce without coincidences. That is to say, life tends to perpetuate, while nonlife does not tend to lead towards life; it just becomes life once in a while by chance.
It does not violate cause and effect. Indeed, it depends on it. The cause (the fact that life forms can mutate, the fact that they can pass on their genes and the fact that some mutations make them more likely to do so) leads to the effect (life forms adapting better to their environment over time).
2006-09-03 07:59:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
POOF! There it is makes much more sense than science OMG I see now, POOF! there it is explains everything...........what a fool I have been because science can't find every fossil of every thing that ever died.
They didn't prove evolution is true by showing experiments with plants and insects actually evolving. The evidence must be all made up 'cause POOF! there it is is air TIGHT!
Fool
2006-09-03 08:03:37 · answer #5 · answered by thewolfskoll 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If a person; that is not saved has a choice between two things. One right and one wrong, he will choose the wrong every time.
People choose to be against the right because they are not right.
The evolution thing is getting real old.
It should be done away with.
I used to listen to the false prophets on the radio and they would rotate around 4 basic things and evolution was one of them.
It was like a merry go round.
I got so I could tell what they would be talking about on a given day.
The wrong will accept the wrong as if it was Gospel. That the way they like it.
OLAY!
2006-09-03 08:07:41 · answer #6 · answered by chris p 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
On the "my god is better than your God, and I will KILL anyone who dissagrees" side of the argument is sheer insanity.
On the Evolution side, there are huge gaps and stupidities, and the "we know everything " crowd just ignore the obvious flaws.
Neither is correct, but the evolutionary side has a bit of hard cold evidence, as shown by killer bacterias that pop up, or DDT resistant mosquitos etc. which are day to day examples of genetics and mutations etc...
2006-09-03 08:08:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I agree. They are willing to say that God violates the cause and effect theories but so does the big bang theory. It has no cause but it has an effect. But that's okay, right. But it's not okay that God has no cause but has an effect. Does that make sense to you? If it does, can you explain it to me?
2006-09-03 08:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by Meg 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it has been said that it takes a lot more faith to believe in the big bang theory than it does to believe that God created all life. Still, people believe what they want to believe. If people don't want to believe in God, they are going to make up every excuse in the book to have it their way. Personally, I think evolution is sometimes just one of the many excuses that people use to justify going their own way, being their own boss, and either not acknowledging God at all, or limiting Him to what they want Him to be rather than who He really is.
2006-09-03 08:11:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You seem to be insisting that Evolution adhere to the laws of thermodynamics. That is much like insisting that birds register flight plans with the FCC. Completely illogical.
I
2006-09-03 08:00:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋