http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HR_4437
2006-09-03 05:28:38 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Yes or No will do
Understand renegade?
2006-09-03 05:37:42 · update #1
I'm for The Fence, National Guard troops patrolling the border, Eventual ousting of all illegal aliens, strict enforcement of existing immigration laws and apple pie a la mode.
Is this an answer?
2006-09-03 05:53:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, in some form. However, the U.S. must think about the work that U.S. citizens are unwilling to do. i.e. picking vegetables on the West Coast. In the south where hurricane destruction is enormous there aren't enough legal workers and because it is federal and state contracts the work has to be completed by U.S. citizens. I am sure some companies aren't following the rules but there are serious fines and penalties for violation. If the U.S. Government allowed for the employment of the illegal immigrants and made some type of allowance for their contribution that could go toward them gaining citizenship then both the residents of the South and the immigrants would prosper.
2006-09-03 05:58:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm for it,you could no longer purely bypass away the door open for each individual to return in,you have those that have criminal archives of their united states and that they are looking out the U. S. is an much less stressful objective,that's no longer counting the lots of persons that are coming unchecked with illnesses and engaged on eating places with out scientific checkups,we've persons that have been no longer able to locate a job because of the fact many places extremely hire an unlawful they might push around extremely than a citizen who will communicate out.
2016-11-06 08:27:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't need any more immigration reform. What we need to do is actually ENFORCE the laws we have on the books now. All this current crap is just that- political crap.
But everyone needs to remember the fact that capitalism can not function without poor people. This is an economic fact. You need the poor in order to maintain the economy. If we chase out all the illegal immigrants then who's going to fill in for them?
2006-09-03 05:36:30 · answer #4 · answered by Steve N 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Didn't go over it in detail but sounds like a good rule to me. Technically there are enough rules if we followed them to curtail the illigal imigration. This will add some teeth to things like employers not checking workers will get a fine. I have no problem with immigrants coming over just do so LEGALLY.
2006-09-03 05:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by JoeP 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm totally in support of HR4437 except the fence must be much longer than 700 miles. I'm for anything that will seal the borders and stop the flow of illegals into this country.
2006-09-03 06:06:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sounds good to me!
If there were really any threat of terrorism against our country, this would have been enacted years ago. Still, it's a great idea because it stops illegals from driving down wages for unskilled labor all over our country.
2006-09-03 05:36:54 · answer #7 · answered by thehotdogbun 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hell yeah. I've already reported a few. Haven't seen those ppl for a few weeks now. I think they're gone ping pong dum dong.
2006-09-05 08:52:58 · answer #8 · answered by auniquekind 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I support HR 25. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h25:
2006-09-03 05:31:51 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most people want HR4437 to become law.....and are preparing to vote out politicians that don't agree.
2006-09-03 05:32:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋