I agree totally - we insist that folks have training and take a test in order to drive a car, but any idiot can have a kid.
2006-09-02 16:48:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by MuffinMan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not every high school student will necessarily become a parent. So not everyone needs it. Also, there may be a fear that a class like that would over-romanticize having babies and families, rather than focusing on how stressful it really is. And I would hope we teach young women and men that there is more to life than reproduction.
In most families, some adult has been a responsible influence and will have taught children about parenting. If someone needs and wants a parenting class, perhaps they should seek one out and take it when or if they need to. It would have been a waste of time and money to educate some students about parenting.
2006-09-02 16:51:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by hrhtheprincessofeire 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question. I don't really have an answer, except that we don't require ANYONE to have a parenting class. To quote more than one famous comedian -- we require people to have a license to drive a car, but any idiot can reproduce and become a "parent". Some schools try to address this -- but they are few and far between, and the attempts fall woefully short of the actuality of parenting. But think about it -- until you're in the middle of it, and parenting your own children, do you REALLY have any idea how hard it is?
What is more to the point -- why do we allow so many students to get through to the high school level without a basic understanding of reproduction, birth control, and personal responsibility? Because seriously, abstinence isn't really a birth control method . . .
2006-09-02 16:46:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lisa M 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've often wondered the same thing. For those of you who assume that the student's parents teach them- think again. Also, given the amount of abuse and neglect reported against young parents it is obvious too many parents are not doing their jobs. We require a lot of courses some students will never use. General courses teaching students the basics of homemaking, including kitchen and automotive as well as basic childcare and parenting should be required for both boys and girls to graduate. If we claim we want students to have a well-rounded education I don't understand how we can leave out basic life skills.
2006-09-02 16:59:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by wolfmusic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think this is a good question. When I was in Jr. High, shop class and home ec were required classes - for boys and girls. I took child development in high school because I thought it would be an interesting class. I'm glad I did. I think it would be good for both guys and girls to take. Seeing some of those births might make the ladies think twice about having unprotected sex. I know the thought of all the pain haunted me for years. But I also learned a lot about all the responsibilities that go along with having a child. It put things in perspective for me and I knew I wouldn't have children until I was happily married and when the time was right for both of us to have them.
2006-09-02 16:57:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Melissa B 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know but in this day and age it is ridiculous. The schools teach how to build things and how to cook. The should indeed teach how to be a good parent. I have 3 children and recently took a parenting class because I was starting to feel like I didn't know how to handle their stages. It was great. I really think that if schools would teach something like this more people would be prepared to be parents.
2006-09-02 16:47:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by mommysrock 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
High school is a place to learn academics and trades. In this country, we have made a drastic shift to merely academics. However, this does not mean that parenting is a trade. Parenting is a skill which should be learned at home. Child development classes can give those who are interested the necessary information to understand roles of parents in children's lives. The schools CANNOT teach all things, as society expects of them. It is a wonder people teach at all.
2006-09-02 16:50:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ambrosia 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hmm... well... thats tough to answer. It would be useful to give a parenting class. It would be much more useful for life than algebra is (depending upon your future profession)...
I actually took 3 parenting classes when I was in high school. I had to go to the guidance conselors and sign myself up for them. I always knew I wanted children though. I had no plans to become anything big and fancy. It just isn't me. I am happily married and pregnant with my first child too and I plan to be a stay at home mom until my child is school age.
2006-09-02 16:45:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ashley P 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parents of the high school kids probably could not agree on a basic parenting curriculum. For instance, would they want their children told day care is very harmful to children? Would they want their kids to know formula is very harmful to children? Would they want their kids to know spanking is very harmful to children? I'd say No on all, as it would make a lot of parents look very bad to have their kids get the truth on the needs of infants/toddlers/et al.
I think that's why we don't offer basic parenting classes in the schools.
2006-09-02 17:50:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by cassandra 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
My nephew was actually give one of those dolls that cries and stuff to take care for school so some school must still teach basic parenting classes
2006-09-02 16:51:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by tinmarfar74 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I graduated college in 2008. i ought to generally be in my 2d year of faculty, yet I dont have sufficient credit, so i will ought to take some classes next year even as operating. the great element about it really is that i will have my associate's degree thoroughly paid off and no student loans. i will move to a school interior sight after next year. i prefer to commute too. i have not in any respect been out of North united statesa. (i have been to California once and Seattle some circumstances, yet except that, i have frequently stayed in Canada, on the west coast. i have not even been a lot right here in any respect). i replaced into questioning about reading in yet another u . s ., notwithstanding the costs are basically way too a lot. i have not been operating a lot, so i could not arise with the money for it with my minimum salary activity and my hours shrink. i prefer to practice English in yet another u . s .. i replaced into questioning about majoring in Philosophy (i comprehend you cant do a lot with a Philosophy degree, notwithstanding it doesnt count number what you important in in case you intend to practice English as a 2d language in yet another u . s .), then get my TESL certificate. i prefer to practice English in a former Soviet republic to be certain the transition from a centrally planned economic equipment to a more effective marketplace depending economic equipment, and the outcomes it had on the type of the recent u . s .. Mine's fantastically idealistic, too, yet hi, it keeps me going because otherwise i ought to haven't any motivation to proceed going to college.
2016-12-06 04:56:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by lellig 4
·
0⤊
0⤋