2006-09-02 14:42:12 · 25 answers · asked by ChiefNickNameadvancer 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
At all costs? no. 10 solders is not worth osama in my opinion.
Don't get me wrong I hope we get him, but at all costs is a bad thing to say. A more tactful way would be more in my favor.
2006-09-02 14:47:50 · answer #1 · answered by mixwithanything 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't pay a bounty on a terrorists head, but I certainly wouldn't stop an open hunting season on them.
Our country needs to be the first to stand up and define the word or term "Terrorist". Another answerer spoke of the IRA and of Nelson Mandella, and he is correct. These groups have used terrorist acts (no differently than animal rights organization PETA) to further their means. Once the term is globally defined and a punishment set....then all terrorists (Global and Domestic) should be treated the same.
2006-09-02 21:52:13 · answer #2 · answered by tjjone 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nobody likes a terrorist. The problem is when you say "at all costs." See Americans have fought & died for our Constitution. However both King George & Hillary Clinton believe we should give up all our rights.
"At any cost." Rather I say let us evict Hillary & George; send them & their families to Iraq. Then take the anti-American Politically Correct & send them there too.
As for terrorists, when they see we mean business, they will go back home. Where is the security in Homeland Security? Nope this whole
bag of dung is dug up to Nazify this country.
Just nuke the whole place...we can keep our rights, watch football & rebuild America. "Terrorism" is an excuse to tear down America...gangs are getting larger, more drugs in America...
Meanwhile the worst President ever is taking away all our rights while the "Politically Correct"
take what's left. We have become Russia...
2006-09-02 21:53:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well, Nelson Mandela's ANC was considered a terrorist organization, and look where that got the US and Britain. The IRA commited terrorist acts and had the tacit support of many in the US. The problem is not the terrorists but the foreign policy. As Noam Chomsky said, if you want to defeat terrorism then stop acting like a terrorist.
2006-09-02 21:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by tiko 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I don't know about at all cost, but we could start an auction, I start the bidding at hundred dollars for each terrorist removed from the face of the earth:)
2006-09-02 23:19:58 · answer #5 · answered by David 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should be killed before the have a chance to become terrorists
2006-09-02 21:52:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think they should but after the termination of all terrorists, there wont be any news to talk about. LOL. that means there lot of terrorist attacks are going on.
2006-09-02 21:49:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
One man's freedom fighter is another mans terrorist.
DOn't think they should be killed - unless they were steps away from insighting 'terror' - but swept away from society. I don't want terrorists living in England, Australia, US etc, where INNOCENT people are be threated by being killed.
2006-09-02 21:50:37 · answer #8 · answered by The Met 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2006-09-02 21:50:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your question is a moot point. Countries are being destabilized and invaded at all costs!
I am the Fringe and things are not looking good for anyone anywhere!
2006-09-02 21:51:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋