If ur answer is yes, then answer this subquestion:
How will u like 2 rename ur resistance?
1-Legal resistance
2-Terrorism
3-Personal persistance.
2006-09-02 10:35:11 · 36 answers · asked by Resonance 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Invasion from whom?
2006-09-02 10:37:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I was talking to my friend about this. War is directional so dependant upon the nation or group that is invading I would first make sure my mother and sister escaped safely in the opposite direction of the enemy. Assuming this is a superior force invading then I would gather a partisan resistance among my circle of friends and break into a local hunting store to gather weaponry and ammo and then an army surplus store for BDU's (for them I already have one) and maybe helmets. Being armed well below any modern troops I would acquire the supplys to make home made silencers (Illinois law forbids them but they're easy enough to make.) I'd put a silencer on a Ruger Mk 3 as even with one it could easily be concealed. If there was time and the option seemed open to me I would build a 9x19mm Submachine gun as I know how using standard plumbing supplies. If I didn't I would use a .223 Remington rifle(light ammo that pierces kevlar, fragments inside someone and can be fatal at 800yd.) as my standard probably a bushmaster or some civilian variation of the m4.
Dependant upon the direction the enemy aproaches I would posistion myself in the country on the flank of their advance. If I place myself and my group in their path of advancing against the metro I live in then my little band would be smashed by a massive force accumulated to take the metro. If I was in the rear then I would face them after they had taken my metro with a full division probably advancing in my direction. If I posistioned my group on the flank of the city then their armored division would advance into it's core along with their good troops while artillery barraged any armed forces in it. My group would only have to worry about the men sent to envelop and thus I should be able to ambush them after disabling their transports with well placed IEDs. If I survived that I would escape into enemy territory and continue my partisan war be that inside citys or continuing ambushing patrols until my last breath.
Why would I name my resistance? Let the enemy name it as they bury their dead and curse their own nation for dragging them to my homeland.
Does that answer your question?
2006-09-02 12:52:57 · answer #2 · answered by crustyrustyaphid 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would ABSOLUTELY defend my home, family and property. There is no one else who will defend us as the police will only act after a crime has been committed. We refuse to be victims.
We will use whatever force is necessary to END an attack that threatens lives or property. We would not however retaliate with an attack on the attackers country or homes.
The best name I can think of for the defense of self, family and property is self-defense, it being necessary to the security of a free State and free men.
Were you aware that in WWII the japanese military prepared a plan to invade California. Hirohitos political advisors counciled against an invasion because "the Americans are all armed".
Kruschev was asked why he did not just invade America, his response was that would be suicide since ALL americans have weapons.
2006-09-09 05:42:05 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
None of the above.
Legal resistance is pointless facing and invasion.
Terrorism is for Cowards and I am not one.
Personal Persistence is an everyday of your life kind of activity and is used in every situation.
I would give my life to protect the place that has been my home, that is how far. I would kill to protect it as well but not in a cowardly way, I treasure my integrity.
2006-09-09 17:36:40 · answer #4 · answered by spider 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This inane question is asked over and over. You can't read the previous responses?
Americans would not resort to terrorism.
Personal persistance? Is that like a hunger strike? Go right ahead. It will have no effect on an invasion.
2006-09-02 10:41:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Homeland defense is the right term. Stand right when you are right. Defend your territory from foreign invasion. It is the right of a person, people or country to defend their own land because it is protected under the constitution and international law.
2006-09-02 10:39:14 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It will be legal Resistance just like the Iraqi people are fighting the Americans.
2006-09-10 07:43:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes,And I would call it the "Piece De "
The Piece de resistance!
We would fight them by pelting them with cakes and we would hurl spoonfuls of jam
at them.We would communicate
with secret messages in desert toppings.
The enemy would be rendered useless( for example) through our ingenius use of special
whipped cream cannons shot from the tops of all the highest rides in all the amusement parks in America,leaving the enemy coated in a sea of gooey caramel
and rasberry compote.
I'd spank the ice cream out dem bishes propuh.
2006-09-09 13:12:24 · answer #8 · answered by moebiusfox 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well HELLO my Arabic sympathizer friend. You want me to put myself in the Palestinian shoes. Well I already did that and I understand there position quite well. I simply don't approve of some of there tactics which have done more harm for there cause than good you really need vastly better leadership to develop better tactics hopefully ones that don't blowup civilians.
2006-09-06 08:57:35 · answer #9 · answered by brian L 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. That is why I'm in the reserve.
Depends on who the invader is and what he desires to achieve. If the situation is like the taliban or khmer rouge or nazi occupation- then anything goes.
2006-09-02 12:35:24 · answer #10 · answered by cp_scipiom 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would. My family is important to me. I would like to name my organization Families Protecting One Another.
2006-09-02 10:47:32 · answer #11 · answered by ride2cowboy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋