a complete total sell out on immigration. His only concern is to play war games in Iraq. Shouldn't you have elected Patrick Buchanan in 2000?
2006-09-02 08:23:20 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I did not vote for Bush in 2000 or 2004.
Hmmm...Patrick Buchanan.
Wow you actually came up with a person who I would dislike more as President than George Bush.
Thanks for the 2 points.
2006-09-02 08:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am glad we elected Bush. I believe Gore and Kerry would have been terrible Presidents. I would prefer Buchanan over either of those two. I think we can elect someone who would be better than Bush (in fact we've GOT to do that), but I don't know yet who he/she might be. We've got to find that person. No one in the House or Senate is qualified.
2006-09-02 08:37:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"I did not vote for Bush in 2000 or 2004.
Hmmm...Patrick Buchanan.
Wow you actually came up with a person who I would dislike more as President than George Bush.
Thanks for the 2 points."
my thoughts exactly. Both are stupid neocons.
2006-09-02 08:28:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely thinking conflict became with a rustic that would desire to of had nuclear weapons even though it became just about obtrusive it did not. additionally for the time of conflict time you don't want a clean president, who's time-honored with of ways plenty extra he might desire to of spent. in simple terms elected a clean guy does not mean he will replace plenty spending smart. Kerry had a great thought yet he had no genuine way of doing that. asserting to end the conflict is in simple terms able and agreeable yet how precisely could he do this? you appear like your at a loss for words through fact interior the extra information you mentioned after 911 and Fahrenheit 911,which btw became a particularly bias action picture and confirmed not something of the different area, and each thing. what's the final section mean. each and every thing?
2016-11-23 19:28:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did not vote for GW either time. I did not believe he was the lesser of the two evils, and still don't. Refresh my memory on Patrick Buchanan.
2006-09-02 08:30:34 · answer #5 · answered by catarina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Buchanan would have been a good president, but third parties don't win.
Bush is a lot better man than either Gore or Kerry.
2006-09-02 08:28:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If we elected Buchanan we'd be at war with Mexico by now.
2006-09-02 10:06:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that in the next election you will see that Americans are fed up with a Republican President.
2006-09-02 08:30:28 · answer #8 · answered by rr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't care for the war in Iraq, total waste of time and money....On other things he has done well....Pat Buchanan is too radical, he would never win....IMO...
2006-09-02 08:44:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOPE...He has become a sell out on many things and I wish he and his oil grubbing buddies would stop shafting the American people. Wish we could recall him like we did with Davis in California.
2006-09-02 08:31:35 · answer #10 · answered by Carrie H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋