A friend who is in the military was told the US would pull out of Iraq if there is a civil war. Is this true?

Answer 1

There's already a civil war going on. Hate to break it to ya but Bush and his cronies claim it as "sectarian violence" to provide a mor positive image. The point is, Iraq is divided among two factions who want control, a civil war.

Answer 2

In the event of a civil war, the U. S would be in the untenable situation of having to choose sides. This would result in either the Sunni's or the Shiite's factions to be enemies of the U.S. The last time the U. S. chose side in a civil was in the Middle east was is in Lebanon where we were forced to leave after the bombing of our Marines. I believe it is clear the U. S. would have to leave in the event of a civil war, but the present administration is going to be very reluctant to declare the situation as a civil war.

Answer 3

Of course that would be the only face saver for the Bush addmistration. They are completely out of ideas on how to pull out of Iraq without been booed. A civil war would create the enabling environment for them to run.

It is a shame.

Answer 4

i think international places that are the two A) nevertheless on a centrally controlled financial gadget (North Korea) B) Theocracies (Iran) C) carry Nukes or D) have no loose press account for the main powerful possibility to international Peace. in basic terms placed, globalization and an integration of economies is arising peace. Of course, John Lennon had a much extra egalitarian perspective to the international. I favorite his concept-approximately a rustic and not using a faith and no funds. besides, back to my element. even nonetheless North Korea isn't a theocracy, that's a dictatorship with females and adult males individuals that worship its chief like a cult. Its females and adult males individuals experience Kim Jong Il's father Kim Il sunlight is a godly be certain. So with that throughout ideas, i think North Korea is a extra physically powerful possibility than Iran considering it meets all of those components I made different than B.

Answer 5

i remember one official quoting on the news when we first went in that it could take up to a decade to settle iraq .. i personally believe they allow or even instigate the violence as an excuse to stay ... the reason is that the US has wanted a military base in the middle east since at least the 6 day war with Israel ... they dont want to give it up trust me ... we will be there for awhile .. bush isnt letting the binladen family build permanent military structures and barracks for nothing...

Answer 6

I heard a rumour to that effect but I remember that the troops in Korea, as they advanced toward the Reservoir, were told that there was no way the Chinese would enter the war, uh, police action.

Answer 7

And I heard from the friend of a friend's friend, who had a cousin in the Korean war, that the U.S. would remain in Iraq until hell froze over. Is this true? Who knows... both your info and mine are RUMORS!!!!!!

Answer 8

No idea at what echelon your friend resides in the "military" but one thing I learned in the Marine Corps is that the rumor mill is alive and well!!!! Believe it when you see the troops back home in the USA........

Answer 9

There already is a civil war...

And yet we are still there

Answer 10

most likely it is is like america invading n.ireland(so to speak)and being oblivous to the catholc/protestant divide removing saddam whoever right or wrong he may have been,(remeber who armedi n the first place)as open up pandora'box