i think its ok cause different races can be affected by illnesses and it's not like theres only one type of dog
2006-09-02 07:18:00 · 11 answers · asked by tizzac 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Genealogy
Anthropologically speaking, there is only one race--the Human, with 4-11 subraces. But, genealogically speaking, race is an important factor in locating a specific person. Medically, there is also good evidence for typing the race of a patient, given that there are genetic predispositions for certain disorders.
Anyone who says we shouldn't, isn't thinking straight. Not to mention color in people, for instance, is just as counterproductive as trying to describe a designer original without reference to its hue.
2006-09-02 07:28:40 · answer #1 · answered by kaththea s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we comprehend a biracial type as they do in Brazil and South Africa this would not be a controversy. in spite of the shown fact that the USA is amazingly simplistic and that's purely a bridge too some distance. we are suffering desperately interior the U. S. to maintain from believing that the worldwide rather is flat and the solar rather does evolve around the Earth. To be so cutting-element as to nicely known biracial human beings skill that we would comprehend and legitimize intimate relationships between whites and blacks or the different race for that remember and for many whites and particularly some blacks and asians those relationships at the instant are not referred to as valid and are in all probability considered as perverse. No mixed race people who % out as one race are self-haters they're dealing with the playing cards they have been dealt interior the U. S..
2016-10-01 05:30:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What are you talking about? As far as I know, there is only one race on this planet and that is the human race; everyone human is then categorized into ethnocity or culture such as Indians, Irish, etc. Then you have sub-cultures, which are punk, gothic, gang and so on. And one other thing, you have the audacity to characterize human beings with dogs?
2006-09-02 07:34:36 · answer #3 · answered by sharptooth3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are differences between the different races. Objective biological ones. No reason not to investigate those. On the contrary it can be quite benficial.
There are also Sociological steriotypes. Those are rubish.
2006-09-02 07:21:14 · answer #4 · answered by evil_tiger_lily 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's ok ..But knowing humanity we'll find a way to screw up agood thing there too.....
Oh Yes...Isn't that what Hitler did in the 30s and 40s ?
Like I said a natural curiosity can be twisted into a weird science.......
2006-09-02 10:48:45 · answer #5 · answered by cesare214 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, there is no reason not to identify races. People take raceism way to far sometimes, they make something out of nothing...
2006-09-02 07:21:42 · answer #6 · answered by michaeln_2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Racial identification is O.K. as long as people don't use it to jusify racism by attaching stereotypes to particular groups.
Don't forget, extraterrestrials would categorize us ALL as the HUMAN race.
2006-09-02 07:28:00 · answer #7 · answered by pat z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is okay to identify races as long as you are not racist about.
2006-09-02 07:57:03 · answer #8 · answered by katlvr125 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In health books we have to because certain diseases are in certain people.
2006-09-02 10:07:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://magegame.ru/?rf=5665726b612d6b6f6e6665746b61
2006-09-02 07:24:01 · answer #10 · answered by Riki R 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋